Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1.    #1  
  2. #2  
    Can't really include HP in an article about companies performing BETTER because they have women at the top.

    To be fair, Whitman certainly wasn't the reason for HP's plunge into sub-mediocrity performance, even if she was part of the non-functioning board at the time.
    32Gb LG G2 - 4.2.2 Jelly Bean
    32Gb TouchPad webOS 3.0.5 / Cyanogenmod 10.1 (4.2.2) Dual Boot @ 1.8Ghz

    16Gb Pre3 webOS 2.2.4 @ 1.9Ghz - Mine
    32Gb TouchPad webOS 3.0.5 @ 1.8Ghz - LunaCE 4.9.5 - Also Mine
    16Gb Pre3 webOS 2.2.4 @ 1.9Ghz - Wife's (replaced with GS3)
    32Gb TouchPad webOS 3.0.5 @ 1.8Ghz - Also Wife's

    Past: 2 Sprint Pre(minuses), a Sprintified Pre+, and a Sprintified Pre2.
  3. #3  
    yes, I'm pretty sure the following line in the article's first paragraph automatically excluded HP and Meg:
    "These companies are impressing stock analysts."
  4. bimmin's Avatar
    63 Posts
    Global Posts
    85 Global Posts
    Isn't saying "woman are better at X" sexist?
    650p | 755p | Centro | Pre | Pixi | Pre 2 | Pre 3 | 2 Touchpads
  5. tabletrus's Avatar
    67 Posts
    Global Posts
    76 Global Posts
    This is just because Meg Whitman is a republican and MSN is hard core leftist. very simple..
  6. #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by bimmin View Post
    Isn't saying "woman are better at X" sexist?
    Get used to it. They bend over backwards to tell us, what they can do better. lol.
    War doesn't prove who's right, only who's left...
  7. trwrt's Avatar
    110 Posts
    Global Posts
    612 Global Posts
    Close this thread before it gets any worse.

Posting Permissions