|
02/17/2010, 02:44 AM
#1909
The performance part of the article bothers me. It very well might be true that the Droid and Nexus One have better performance than the Pre with Flash; the Droid has a slightly faster CPU and the Nexus One has a much faster CPU. However, considering the three phones all use different wireless carriers, not nearly enough information was given in the article to say that the stated reason, slow Internet at the location, was not the case. Or, if they're using Wifi, that should be stated... and if that's the case, wouldn't an intelligent followup be to ask if all three phones were connected to the same wireless network?
Also, considering that Flash 10.1 was first demoed on the Pre before the Droid or Nexus One, the headline and first paragraph's tone that make it sound like this is something new are just completely wrong.
Anyway, I believe Adobe's booth is just being opened today, so I'm sure Dieter will have some sort of information at some point later on.
As for
I hate all this confusing/misinformed reporting/doublespeak crap on the internet. Wouldn't it be nice for someone to say, "Ok. It's done. It's going to be released on [XXXX DATE]."
Delays happen in software development. It's just a fact of how things work. If Palm announces a firm date, and then can't meet that, it makes them look bad. People complain enough when Palm doesn't meet rumored dates because of internal delays, I can't imagine what it'd be if it was Palm announcing those dates. Unfortunately, sometimes issues crop up at the last minute, or things can't be finished as quickly as you'd hope.
|
|
|