|
08/10/2011, 06:21 PM
#3
Sigh just realized I put this in the wrong forum, somehow missed the Pre 2 forum earlier. Smack me with stupid stick.
Honestly the screen size doesn't bother me on the Pixi, I owned Treos and WinMo phones for years. It's only important to me because so many developers refuse to code things that work for the pixi's screen. Maybe the presence of the Veer will help, but I doubt it. Had the same problem in Android land; you HAVE to have an 800 x 480 screen sucking down battery life like there's no tomorrow because the developers won't code for hvga. Stupid, all that does is lose you customers.
Honestly the cpu I don't think will matter much to me either, except it's capable of flash. (I still find it funny most webOS users here seem to blame HP/Palm for no flash when it's actually Adobe's fault, they only code for the highest end cpu's because they can't write optimized code to save their lives - low end droids like the Optimus have the same problem) In most respects it seems the Pixi's main problem spec-wise was a lack of ram.
Mostly I want the improvements of 'OS 2, the larger app support base, better browser and less lag. The things I think I'll miss the most are keyboard, one handed use, thin profile, maybe battery life though the only comparison I've seen is between pre 1 & 2, my free hotspot ( I know about tether but is would seem so does VZW and AT&T as of this week) oh and probably the Pre itself after I drop it a few times. (its definitely harder to hang onto) The slider would probably bug me if I weren't such a Trek fan, as it is a simple sound on opening it should cure that. At least it's vertical, I hate side sliders.
Sigh, really I wish they'd just release a new Pixi with the Pre 3 that has Pre 2 guts.
|
|
|