|
 Originally Posted by Brian Stradale
This is an "anti-rant" followed by "rant" from the eyes of an old Palm guy...
...
First of all, thank you for a very well-reasoned, measured "rant". It's refreshing to see someone express disappointment/frustration without demanding, whining, berating, and/or literally ranting (I really wouldn't call yours a rant).
I have a suggestion, but before I make it, I'm going repeat something I said a long time ago.
I too, am a long time Palm user. I remember when I got my first Treo, and saw the keyboard. I thought it was one of the stupidest ideas Palm had ever come up with. I was just about an expert on Graffiti, and knew there was no way a keyboard would be better. I didn't rant and rave about it, mostly keeping my opinion to myself (mostly, not completely). I have to say though, this was less because of self-restraint, and more because I was getting the Treo for free (long story, but the short version is, if you've been in the IT field a long time, you get lots of things for free).
Anyway, I immediately got online, and began looking for programs that would allow me to continue to use Graffiti. I tried out a few, and finally settled on a commercial program that I paid for.
The funny thing is... I used it for about 3 weeks and then stopped. During that 3 week period, I saw my use dwindle almost daily, and then one day I realized that I had gone several weeks without using it.
Now, here's another funny part; I'm virtually 100% sure that I did Graffiti faster on the older Palm devices than I could type on the newer. That's probably still true. However, I think a keyboard is a better option (and you probably do as well) in spite of the fact that (for me) Graffiti was faster.
There are a lot of reasons that I feel this way, but the short version is that a keyboard is more standard, requires less of an "interpreter", and is easier to support.
I look at Palm's move to "the cloud" in much the same way. Yes, there are advantages to the "old way", and yes Palm could have provided some sort of free alternative to let you keep using things the "old way", but they chose not to. I think that was the right choice on their part, again for several reasons, but I'll touch on the main ones:
- Less support headaches - If they had provided a desktop sync solution, they would have to support that solution.
- Encourages people to embrace change - If they had provided a solution, more folks would have immediately jumped into what was "familiar and comfortable" (and also, unfortunately, old school).
- Demonstrates committment to a "new way" - This is a little harder to articulate, but I'll try. Had they included a Palm supported desktop sync solution, it would (likely) have been interpreted as "This is the right way to do things, but we'd like you to look at this new possiblity as well". Not including a solution shows that they are committed to the cloud.
Now, all that said. Here's my suggestion. Give the cloud solution a try. Sign up for a free Gmail account. You can still get everything back to your desktop computer if you wish, but it actually works! Here's a few tips if you don't want to completely jump. The contacts can be completely backed up from Google as a CSV file. I haven't figured out an elegant way to backup the calendar (yet), but I believe that you could have any entered event automatically forward an invitation to your current email address, which will send in ICS file that you can import into your desktop calendar. That should work for you.
Give it a try, and see what you think. You might find the desktop tether as easy to give up as I found Graffiti.
|
|
|