|
 Originally Posted by ponyfool
Not really true. With any remote start, the key needs to be in the car and turned on before the vehicle is capable of driving off. I have a GM vehicle with factory remote, and I can't get the car in gear without the key even though it's running.
This is a "cool" feature, but if you already have remote start, it is sort of a waste of money. The $30/year is a bit excessive too IMO.
Not 100% accurate... With a remote starter there are a few things that will turn off the vehicle depending on the product. With most standard remote starters this will be the brake and a 15 or 30 minute timer.... I am guessing in your vehicle you have to press the brake to put the car in gear... which would shut off the remote starter if it doesn't see output ignition. This could be bypassed by quickly unplugging the brake molex above the pedal(some systems will know to shut down in this case but not most) and then just using a pry bar(my foot or just pulling hard and breaking the transmission parking paw) then I would be able to be in any gear I wanted. Another potential problem would be the steering wheel wheel lock which is also relatively easily broken on most cars (some very new cars will disable steering completely). Another problem would be the thief actually entering the vehicle without setting off the alarm (braking the glass with a glass breaking tool(or a spark plug) will not set off most alarms). Then I would have the remaining time left on the timer to drive to a chop shop or something of the sort. Security is all about multiple layers of protection and believe me even with a standard remote starter you are far better off then to have nothing at all. So please don't think of a remote starter as a vulnerability, it is the opposite.
|
|
|