|
 Originally Posted by positron
It's Amazing how quite a few posters have dodge the main point, and side stepped the "elephant in the room." First, email services and net companies have been reading / spying on your private info for years. They even came out a couple of years ago and admitted IT! Remember the "lame" excuse of terrorist using email ETC!! (They have to read your Private Mail to stop and find terrorist)
BUT, I'll try Again, to talk about Documents being (Removed) by Net Companies....
Google only has the "sensitive" info that they do "still" have, along with Youtube that powers or general negative forces would rather not be accessable, ONLY because you do have copies in your Phones and on hard drives at home or in your own possession as a off-set stalemate!
Many documents and Videos are pulled down and banned quite often. I and many groups find they are usually some of the most important and explosive proof of events, and of important infornmation. Also hold (sites) that hold important info are blocked or Removed by net companies.
I say we must keep the "stalemate" in place with info in our phones and hard drives.
But if the "Pre" and the Cloud take over, get ready for statements like...
"What Documents"! "There was no proof"! Etc...
But some will say we as slide into surfdom: "Nice "Pre" Cloud Phone."
You are so mixing analogies here, so it's next to impossible to counter what you're tryng to say, since it's hard to even know what you're trying to say.
First of all, you are not talking about "the cloud", you are talking about a very small portion of "the cloud". As has been pointed out to you, corporate servers are also part of the cloud.
Secondly, whether Googole, YouTube, or anyone else chooses to erase something off their hard drive, that does not erase it out of existance. You watcht a YouTube video, you can download it to your harddrive to keep a local copy. Even if you don't, it's still copied to your hard drive before it's played (it's on your cache).
So, this idea that could computing is going give the power to erase history to a few individual users is way off base, both conceptually and technologically.
|
|
|