|
 Originally Posted by HardBeatZ
You are correct that at this time Palm does have a very small market share, but the idea is to not only be able to maintain that market share but then look at the where the market will be next year..and the year after that. Palm's biggest gain is not going to be from users switching from an Iphone or a Droid to Palm, it's going to be a new user picking up their first smart phone, the market is ever expanding and there is plenty of room for Palm to pick up some of that space.
That made sense when you were a struggling stand alone company, that doesn't make as much sense when you are a struggling business unit within a large organisation. When you only turn out half-baked smart-phones, then your only choice is to keep turning out them out and going on about how having a single percentage market share would be a great success. However, as part of a large company such as HP, opportunity cost starts to come into play, over the long term does it really make any sense to keep pumping time and resources into a failed struggling OS than was the decision of the last guy (Mark Hurd) or do you simply go back to being a grey box shifter and start turning out Windows 7 or android phones to stay relevant in the smart-phone space.
I just can't see why anyone picking up a smart-phone today, tomorrow or next year would pick a WebOS device over anything else out in the market that actually has some buzz around it. I think, for example, Windows 7 phone is going to eat you alive and the Android onslaught is not going to stop.
If the (predicted) devices at CES are duff, that's it for you.
|
|
|