|
 Originally Posted by danjb
I own both (bought Mapopolis first before TomTom was available). IMO, the only ways Mapopolis would have an advantage:
- You are more used to Mapopolis (I suspect most who favor Mapopolis on this board might be in this category; it's been around longer).
- A map in a particular area you need is more accurate. All mapping products have some variances between their maps and reality. I can't say one is more accurate than the other in general, but you might find a difference of importance to you in a particular location.
- If you never use or plan to use a GPS with your mapping program. TomTom is optimized (assumes) a GPS, although it can be used w/o one. In Mapopolis, a GPS is a bit more of a bolt-on / afterthought.
Otherwise, TomTom is far faster, looks much nicer, and is much easier to use. Functionally, they're very similar, but the ease of use and speed of TomTom make it seem more like a consumer appliance, and Mapopolis seems more like a "proof of concept" (look, you can do mapping on a Palm device).
Regarding Mapopolis, I must say that the NavCard solution is very slick and VERY fast - much faster then the one running off the device itself. Just got it, and very appreciative of it. Where it used to take about a minute to two minutes to route locally (or just reset ALOT), the NavCard is a completely different animal.
I don't get restarts, the routing is AMAZINGLY fast, and overall I'm very happy with the purchase. I have not used TomTom, but I can tell you that I love Mapopolis NavCard.
|
|
|