|
SORRY ABOUT THE ABOVE POST, Somethin's wrong with my internet connection or TreoCentral, but it didn't post it all...so this is the entire repost, including the bottom half from 2 posts up:
"
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
WOW!!!! Way to much crap to respond to!!!!
Agreed...completely.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
1) Sprint's $10 plan does not cover EV-DO...WiFi is WAY faster than the 1xRTT and given a choice I would connect to WiFi anyday instead of paying the $40-$90 EV-DO rates. And all the other carriers are more expensive on their data plans.
I realize that Sprint's price doesn't cover EV-DO and that other carriers are higher. That's why I have Sprint and am not upgrading my Treo 650 until there's a phone with Palm Linux, EV-DO, AND Wi-FI. It'll happen in two years, not one. And at the absolute most, three years.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
2) Sprint announced EV-DO in 34 markets yesterday. While not as much as 1xRTT, it's WAY more than enough to make it serious.
It's most definitely serious, but not that much. How many total markets does Sprint have?? Take 34 outta that number and it's geographically going to be a tiny area. For travelers, which includes a large number of 650 users...most will prolly wait for the price to come down a little or perhaps replace our broadband connection at home with EV-DO...I'd certainly have to if paying those prices.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
3) By your argument of not including upgrades till the next feature, the 650 would be much less of a machine than it is.....ACTUALLY, the 600 would have had WAY fewer features. More than likely there was a technical and/or cost reason the 650 didn't have WiFi, but I'll bet that reason has been overcome. But one other consideration is the carrier and it appears that Verizon had the SX-66 WiFi removed, so that could be the case for the next Treo on some carriers.....but not all (just like the SX-66.) Oh, and the SX-66 is selling very well despite what you say (my company alone has purchased several of them in the past month.)
I've already told you like a bajillion reasons that WiFi wasn't in the 650 and won't be in the 700. I'm not going to be typing in this thread or in response to slinky anymore. Between these two, I can't find time to eat and ****.
But anyway, the 600 did have WAY fewer features than it should...and so did the 650...One reason I hate capitalism (Could have doubled the RAM on the Treo if they had spent like $5 more per Treo (if even that much); I woulda gladly paid an extra $5 or $10 even for RAM, but this could prolly be the first thing to irritate me in the future when looking at newer phones slip past me without my touch).
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
Edit: Oh, although I know what you are getting at, this makes absolutely no sense at all! "No matter where I go, I get broadband like speeds due to the tabs in firefox."
Well....everyday I get on my computer, I start by clicking bookmarks, going to my "EVERYDAY" folder at the top that has (you guessed it) the websites I visit daily, and right-clicking it to Open all of them in multiple tabs at once. I've done this on a couple trips already with the Bluetooth DUN. After the first webpage is down downloading (It's Slashdot by the way; LINK: http://www.slashdot.org), I read it...When I close it...all of the other 18 or so websites have already downloaded in the background. I never have to wait for anything with tabs...no matter how fast my connection is. Sometimes I wonder why I pay for broadband anymore, 'cause I don't download massive (mostly illegal) multimedia files anymore. I think most people could live without broadband if they knew about Firefox.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
Another thought....who needs seamless roaming between towers and WiFi?!! When I'm in an WiFi zone, I can disconnect from the network and connecto to WiFi....simple.
I'd rather not get WiFi 'til Palm Linux was out so that I could seamlessly roam between whatever wireless connection provides good enough signal for VoIP!! Other than that, I've already said I don't want WiFi on my phone 'til more WiFi spots show up around here (Not likely) or I move to a college campus (Gettin' tired of this community college sheet)...now that I think about it, going to school where I'm surrounded by WiFi makes me want to cross-over. Just for a second, though...I can wait 'til Palm Linux comes and I can cancel Sprint's service altogether...I'm only kidding Sprint. I'd never do it!
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
Why browse my local network? Let's start by controlling my HTPC. That's just one of several examples I could come up with.
Good one. Now come up with one more. What HTPC do you have by the way?? I was considering building a MythTV PVR outta some fanless components so that I could truly leave it on. But I'm gonna have to wait for one more year maybe to get the components that I really want.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
And why use cellular when I am sitting in a house covered by WiFi?? And yes, when I'm at home I would often prefer to use my phone than drag out my laptop. And BT is not fine, it doesn't cover all 3 floors of my house like my WiFi and it's to slow.
EXACTLY...why use cellular when sitting in a house covered by WiFi?? Don't you have REAL computers?? Bluetooth goes more than 600 feet if you have the proper adapter...that's when you could use it at an office or your home. And the speeds are prolly just as fast as your broadband connection can throw at you...unless you have a T3 or somethin'.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
Just because ppl buy a 650 w/o WiFi doesn't mean the don't care about WiFi and doesn't mean they won't care more about WiFi when other units on the market are offering it. And I guess all those ppl that bought the SX-66 proved there are ppl who DO care about WiFi. What about all the ppl buying the WiFi SD card? Do they care about WiFi?
Most don't really care about WiFi, though, compared to cellular networks/radios and bluetooth...I'm about to start a poll to get this topic over with until Palm actually releases the real phone.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
It cost extra money to add features everytime they upgrade a unit, yet they do it....invalid argument.
Valid argument, remember. Capitalist country...the goal of large businesses is not to innovate, it's to make money! Capital=money=power! In this game, Palm is winning and will continue to win by delaying WiFi for one more upgrade. After that, then they start to lose a little ground.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
Conservative carriers don't want you off their data plan? Cingular has WiFi on the SX-66....invalid argument
Nobody buys the SX-66, at least compared to the 650. But yea, for the most part, you got me there. I honestly don't care what phone is released in the next 11 months 'cause I know it's not going to compare to whatever Palm's top model is at the time. But I prolly still won't be upgrading for another year after that point that I start looking at phones again.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
You have seen Palm's research?!?! Wow, share it with us! 
Haven't you been listening...It says, NO WIFI, BEECHES! It's even worded just like that at the top of one of those pages...yup.
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
BTW, I'm not in Austin and I don't have crazy WiFi coverage. But I want the feature to be available to use when I have the opportunity to use it (I piggyback on my roommies T-Mobile hotspot account for one...my Church and favorite non-Starbucks coffee shop have free WiFi as well.)
That piggybacking stuff isn't very moral now is it, Mr. Church-goer. Also, aren't there more important things to do at Church besides check if TreoCentral's homepage has been updated yet?? I seriously doubt you people would really use WiFi that much unless if you required it for work, lived on a college campus, or needed to use VoIP. I don't see Church or the occasional coffee shop as a good enough reason to DEMAND that this smartphone which is good enough as is be upgraded with WiFi. You could try the bluetooth reverse DUN, though...maybe try getting a Class 1 USB....What do you do at work that would require it?
 Originally Posted by Geckotek
Oh, did I forget to mention the native support for WiFi in Windows Mobile 5.0? I guess M$ thinks WiFi is important in a Smartphone.
We've already gone over this....they're the ones doing the catch up. Of course they're going to do whatever they can...competition is a great thing (not to be confused with capitalism; I still think competition could be possible without it..again, another convo, another thread). But a lotta customer base already belongs to Palm and I think that's what keeps Apple rolling along as well.
The thing I'm trying to point out is not how many devices have WiFi, or that there might actually be a coupla good uses for WiFi on the Treo. But what I am saying is that it's not going to be a deal breaker for most Treo users; hence, it ain't happenin', guys!"
|
|
|