|
01/06/2005, 08:18 PM
#870
 Originally Posted by specimen38
Hayswj,
You seem like a cool person. The props comment is not referring to you. It's referring to those persons who hastily rush to create a new threads, "GSM Treo 650 Announced" ... "It's Official", etc..... There are some people who want an edge so to speak...perhaps "one-up-man-ship" thinking. However, in my case, I am trying to respect the TC forum rules and post good information and comments inside appropriate forums. When I am wrong about something or have a bad source, I say to my fellow thread members "I was wrong. My sources were bad." It doesn't take anything from me. I think that's courteous and respectful -- and fosters a great environment for information exchange. You may not agree, but that is the way I see the world.
Now...regarding your post yesterday. I read it and I am certain others did also. Please  forgive me if I am skeptical  about embracing another date and building my hopes up. I too want this phone badly, but I don't think it's fair to contribute to the frenzy. So a couple of weeks back I decided not to feel anxious because it will come when it comes....
Well if this is referring to me as the initiator of the "Cingular Announces 650 release date" or whatever is was called. I did apologize both in this thread and in the original thread:
http://discussion.treocentral.com/sh...8&postcount=65
Teh Cingular release date was set, as verified by more than just me. I had very good information and all I can tell you it has to do with the number of issues that Cingular experieinced during their in house trials with the 650, which cingular always does. I was right on on the Siemens SX66, it ws not my fault that the phone failed Cingular's in house testing. And again, when it was delayed, it apologized without any prodding.
By the way I do have a new date, and have had one. I just am not going to be caught with my foot in my mouth again.
|
|
|