Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1.    #1  
    why are the camera and cameraless phone the same price?
  2. #2  
    Sprint did the same thing when they released the cameraless version.

    Perhaps they can't lower the price because there is a cost associated with removing or covering up the camera and disabling the camera software?
  3. #3  
    For me, the Treo with the camera is absolutely worthless- I'd even be willing to pay a premium for the WOC version. Manufacturing-wise, it makes sense that they're the same cost; the manufacture of the phone would be identical except for the physical lens and camera, and massed produced, those parts only cost a couple bucks. And that cost is probably just about offset by having to specially make a smaller run of no-camera versions. I'd expect that the WOC actually costs PalmOne *more* to make than the one with the camera!
  4. #4  
    Because that is what the market is willing pay.

Posting Permissions