|
Well, this is my last post on this topic because we are going around in circles here. You want to have the last word after this, go ahead.
Again, you continue to criticize the current Administration's approach without offering any constructive (or even coherent) alternatives. What, exactly, do you suggest we do to oppose the Taliban? Call them nasty names?
Impose sanctions? Already done, and it just punishes the poor saps who are oppressed by the leadership already. Diplomacy? Hey, that's been tried in the past - they paid a lot of attention to world opinion before they blew up those ancient statues of Bhudda.
The Taliban are currently sheltering an organization that has been proven (in court) to have been behind the bombing of the embassies in Africa, and is suspected based on strong evidence of having been behind the U.S.S. Cole bombing and the 9/11 attacks. Al Queda and bin Laden have sworn they will continue to kill Americans, making no distnictions between civilian and military targets. The Taliban refuse to turn them over for justice, or to dismantle their terror operation. As long as these folks are free, other Americans (indeed, folks from other nations who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time too) are at risk.
They won't turn them over, because they like what they did. I heard a young Arab-American woman interviewed on NPR this morning. She said they hate us because of what we stand for, and pointed out that if she lived in Afghanistan she'd be beaten or worse because she sometimes doesn't cover her head - there's your "root cause." At this point, military action is necessary and justified.
It's easy to carp Homer, and talk and talk and talk about finding the "cause" and pursuing unidentified "alternatives." It's hard to offer a real alternative that would work. You come up with one, let me know.
Regarding my brother, number 1 the analogy is faulty when you are dealing with small kids or even teenagers. There's a big difference between two brothers and actors on the international stage. There's also a rather big difference between a shoving match and murdering 6,000+ men, women and even some children, the overwhelming majority of which were civilians. It was my mistake to even accept the bogus comparison for the sake of argument. But to answer your question, the last time he picked a fight with me when we were old enough for it to make a difference, yeah, I hit him hard enough that he didn't try it again. I hope America does the same here.
'Nuff said.
|
|
|