|
If you read into battery life tests etc, 1.18ghz seems to be the sweet spot that gives the longest life while providing the most processing power.
HP likely underclocked the chip for many reasons, not the least of which being this fact. They were probably also going for longevity of the device and reduced cooling requirements. Since most tablets on the market are clocked at 1ghz or below, a dual core at 1.18 was already an improvement, and leaving it underclocked even gave HP an opportunity to bump it up at a later date to keep their old hardware competing with new devices on the market - AND - simultaneously made the 64gb version look even "better" thanks to it's 1.5ghz chip.
Of course, the battery drain isn't -much- higher at 1.5ghz (it is noticeably worse at dual 1.8ghz though). The device runs nicer at 1.5ghz and as far as I can tell there's been no issues whatsoever (that's how uberkernel is set up - they only accept and deliver speeds that there have been no reported issues with, hence the lack of 1.7ghz and beyond). This chip supports 1.5ghz. All evidence points to this being true from the spec sheets to the 64gb pad to ordinary people using the overclock. Just do it .
|
|
|