Crazy Range in Sunspider Score!

**Azentropy** · 09/21/2011, 06:52 PM

32GB TP 3.0.2 OC 1.5Ghz - 3459.6ms +/- 1.7%
64GB iPad2 iOS5b7 - 1835.4ms +/- 0.6%

**vszulc** · 09/21/2011, 07:35 PM

Originally Posted by next_milenium

Quadcore (Xenon E5506 @ 2.13ghz with 3.5g ram), Windows XP, IE 7:

24841.0ms

Very strange. Score must be browser dependent so different scores on different machines using different browsers are pretty meaningless.

Eh no... While that score is def. a fluke, it's far from meaningless. If you score 2000 in one browser and 3000 in a different browser on an iPad, but 4000 on a TP, that still clearly shows that the iPad overall is faster, even though browser A is faster than browser B on an iPad.

I have a whole handful of scores, since I checked it out on all of the tablets in the store when I went tablet shopping, hehe...

Intel Atom D250: 1300
Brand new Acer laptop, 2.4 ghz AMD CPU: 662
HTC Evo3D: 6102
HP Touchpad, stock 32GB: 4400
HP Touchpad, all patches, stock mhz: 4210
iPad2: 2268
Acer Iconia 7inch: 2123
Blackberry Playbook: 2461
Acer Transformer: 2310
Acer Iconia 10inch: 2253

Now while these scores can tell you in general, which browser is the fastest/has the best Javascript implementation and roughly which device is faster, its only a guideline. For example: The HTC cellphone had a much slower score than the TP, but nevertheless seems much faster in everyday use. The Acer laptop that on paper is 3 times as fast as the iPad also feels more like its on par with an iPad rather than three times as fast.

**next_milenium** · 09/21/2011, 10:34 PM

32g OC'd to 1.5 uberkernel with patches.

3358 (3357 on 2nd run so very consistent).

it seems comparing different machines on different browser can only give you a rough comparison of browser (javascript actually) performance.

what I really like to know is why mine is slower than others with same configuration.

**vanzanthp** · 09/21/2011, 10:40 PM

Here's mine.

Sunspider
Desktop PC Phenom II X4 4G Firefox -- 275.1ms
Gateway Laptop N660 CPU 8G Ram Firefox -- 369.2ms
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min -- 3792.6ms
Dell Streak 5 Android 2.2 Froyo -- 5983.4ms
Apple iPod Touch 4 iOS 4.2.1 -- 10310.9ms

A few website times for my devices.

slickdeals.net
Desktop PC Phenom II X4 4G Firefox -- 1.5 sec
Apple iPod Touch 4 iOS 4.2.1 -- 15 sec
Dell Streak 5 Android 2.2 Flash OFF -- 13 sec
Dell Streak 5 Android -- 23 sec
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min -- 25 sec
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min NO FLASH -- 19 sec

I assume, but did NOT check, that apple.com has NO Flash.
apple.com
Desktop PC Phenom II X4 4G Firefox -- 1.5 sec
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min -- 9 sec
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min NO FlASH -- 8 sec
Dell Streak 5 Android 2.2 Flash OFF -- 5 sec
Apple iPod Touch 4 iOS 4.2.1 -- 6 sec

imdb.com
Desktop PC Phenom II X4 4G Firefox -- 1 sec
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min NO FLASH -- 8 sec
TP STOCK except -logging restricted to min -- 16 sec
Apple iPod Touch 4 iOS 4.2.1 -- 12 sec
Dell Streak 5 Android 2.2 FLash OFF -- 9 sec
Dell Streak 5 Android 2.2 -- 11 sec

**next_milenium** · 09/21/2011, 11:17 PM

to be fair, even though I'm not certain, some websites have phone or tablet friendly format and may load faster because of that.

**anon(112897)** · 09/21/2011, 11:47 PM

3183.5 Uber 1.5Ghz

**snake65** · 09/22/2011, 01:01 AM

f15 ocd 1.8mhz on demand all patches 2757.5 sun spider.
cheers
john

cleared cache 2740

**Komix2k** · 09/22/2011, 01:09 AM

32GB TP (Warthog 1.7 OC) 3004.1

Gateway Desktop Core2 Quad 8200 2.33GHZ intel, 8GB DDR2 Ram
IE9 = 281.4
Opera 11.51 = 330.8
Chrome 14 = 370.1
Kylo 1.0 (from Mozilla group) = 353.6

**Mac.World** · 09/22/2011, 01:13 AM

Based off what I have seen here, it looks like the jump from the uberkernal 1.5 to warthog or F15 1.8 is about a 40% jump in performance (at least for sunspider scoring).

I am a bit hesitant to overclock to 1.8 but I'd be curious to know how much faster apps open or if it has actually aided in rendering websites , in particular Flash sites, any quicker?

**FastCat** · 09/22/2011, 07:36 AM

Completely unmodified 16Gb TP...

running Stock Browser: 4051.8ms +/- 3.3%

running Advanced Browser: 3918.7ms +/- 2.8%

Virtually all of time difference (~130ms) comes during JSJSJS $String$ $processing$.

**Incindium** · 09/22/2011, 11:45 AM

32Gb Touchpad With Uberkernal @1.5ghz with all the recommended patches/perf improvements in Stock browser
3266.7ms
3222.7ms
3257.3ms

**PSOfan** · 09/30/2011, 05:06 AM

Do I win? :-]

Touchpad 1.8Ghz (F4 kernel) @ 2661.5ms

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2661.5ms +/- 1.1%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 457.0ms +/- 0.8%
cube: 145.7ms +/- 0.5%
morph: 136.7ms +/- 0.6%
raytrace: 174.6ms +/- 2.2%

access: 188.3ms +/- 1.5%
binary-trees: 17.0ms +/- 3.4%
fannkuch: 51.5ms +/- 1.3%
nbody: 100.0ms +/- 1.7%
nsieve: 19.8ms +/- 5.6%

bitops: 131.0ms +/- 2.3%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 11.0ms +/- 4.3%
bits-in-byte: 20.8ms +/- 2.2%
bitwise-and: 28.3ms +/- 2.1%
nsieve-bits: 70.9ms +/- 3.7%

controlflow: 9.6ms +/- 5.2%
recursive: 9.6ms +/- 5.2%

crypto: 212.6ms +/- 7.4%
aes: 87.9ms +/- 23.8%
md5: 75.0ms +/- 30.2%
sha1: 49.7ms +/- 4.5%

date: 380.5ms +/- 2.7%
format-tofte: 134.4ms +/- 7.4%
format-xparb: 246.1ms +/- 5.8%

math: 292.1ms +/- 7.2%
cordic: 126.1ms +/- 15.7%
partial-sums: 115.0ms +/- 1.5%
spectral-norm: 51.0ms +/- 21.5%

regexp: 81.3ms +/- 1.2%
dna: 81.3ms +/- 1.2%

string: 909.1ms +/- 2.2%
base64: 95.7ms +/- 24.4%
fasta: 94.5ms +/- 1.6%
tagcloud: 215.4ms +/- 1.8%
unpack-code: 309.1ms +/- 3.7%
validate-input: 194.4ms +/- 5.3%

**hhy2k** · 10/20/2011, 04:11 AM

After 3.0.4 update with F4 Phantom kernel v81 @ 1.836 GHz with ondemandctl profile, no patches yet.

Sunspider

Without flash: 2450 pts (with flash 2517 pts)

am I winning now? ;-)

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2451.7ms +/- 4.2%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 414.6ms +/- 0.9%
cube: 144.0ms +/- 2.7%
morph: 144.9ms +/- 0.9%
raytrace: 125.7ms +/- 1.2%

access: 365.4ms +/- 27.6%
binary-trees: 21.2ms +/- 14.5%
fannkuch: 48.7ms +/- 1.0%
nbody: 273.7ms +/- 35.2%
nsieve: 21.8ms +/- 11.4%

bitops: 131.6ms +/- 3.4%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 10.3ms +/- 3.4%
bits-in-byte: 20.2ms +/- 2.2%
bitwise-and: 27.8ms +/- 2.7%
nsieve-bits: 73.3ms +/- 6.2%

controlflow: 9.2ms +/- 6.1%
recursive: 9.2ms +/- 6.1%

crypto: 143.8ms +/- 2.9%
aes: 56.5ms +/- 7.0%
md5: 43.0ms +/- 1.6%
sha1: 44.3ms +/- 1.5%

date: 324.3ms +/- 1.4%
format-tofte: 100.7ms +/- 1.4%
format-xparb: 223.6ms +/- 1.6%

math: 276.9ms +/- 3.3%
cordic: 113.4ms +/- 0.9%
partial-sums: 117.4ms +/- 7.4%
spectral-norm: 46.1ms +/- 3.0%

regexp: 80.0ms +/- 0.8%
dna: 80.0ms +/- 0.8%

string: 705.9ms +/- 1.0%
base64: 37.1ms +/- 5.5%
fasta: 102.7ms +/- 1.0%
tagcloud: 185.8ms +/- 3.2%
unpack-code: 233.9ms +/- 1.0%
validate-input: 146.4ms +/- 0.8%

**Daemon** · 10/20/2011, 05:00 AM

Same config. 3.0.4 F4 v81 ondemandtcl
===========================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2313.1ms +/- 1.6%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 414.3ms +/- 0.8%
cube: 130.0ms +/- 2.3%
morph: 133.3ms +/- 7.3%
raytrace: 151.0ms +/- 5.8%

access: 189.6ms +/- 6.0%
binary-trees: 16.3ms +/- 4.2%
fannkuch: 49.9ms +/- 0.5%
nbody: 102.8ms +/- 11.1%
nsieve: 20.6ms +/- 8.4%

bitops: 132.7ms +/- 9.1%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 10.6ms +/- 5.7%
bits-in-byte: 21.4ms +/- 1.7%
bitwise-and: 27.9ms +/- 0.8%
nsieve-bits: 72.8ms +/- 16.4%

controlflow: 9.1ms +/- 2.5%
recursive: 9.1ms +/- 2.5%

crypto: 190.2ms +/- 5.5%
aes: 77.4ms +/- 25.3%
md5: 67.0ms +/- 29.7%
sha1: 45.8ms +/- 6.8%

date: 322.9ms +/- 2.3%
format-tofte: 105.4ms +/- 3.2%
format-xparb: 217.5ms +/- 4.4%

math: 274.4ms +/- 8.7%
cordic: 125.4ms +/- 14.2%
partial-sums: 106.6ms +/- 9.1%
spectral-norm: 42.4ms +/- 7.8%

regexp: 79.5ms +/- 2.2%
dna: 79.5ms +/- 2.2%

string: 700.4ms +/- 2.9%
base64: 71.4ms +/- 31.9%
fasta: 88.3ms +/- 1.6%
tagcloud: 157.8ms +/- 1.1%
unpack-code: 214.1ms +/- 1.0%
validate-input: 168.8ms +/- 1.5%

**eblade** · 10/20/2011, 06:00 AM

f15c 3.0.4-80 @ 1.7ghz: 2402ms

amd 3.3ghz quad-core runing opera 12: 210ms

**horseybob** · 10/21/2011, 12:44 PM

F15C 3.04 - 80.
1.89GHz

Ondemandtcl, SIO, Westwood.
up threshold 65%
L2 boost turned off

sunspider - 2286.1ms
Lithium HD - 77

my brand new HP 8560w laptop workstation
8Gb, i7-2820QM quad

me like. Me like LOTS

sunspider - 194.0

**WesleyTP** · 10/21/2011, 02:20 PM

CM7 alpha 2, 1.7ghz, skyfire browser: 3841
CM7 alpha 2, 1.7ghz, android browser: 2387
F15C 3.0.4-80 @ 1.89GHz, Ondemandtcl, L2=1: 2582
ThinkPad w520, 12gb@1600mhz, i7-2720QM, ie9: 163
ThinkPad, ... chrome: 218

**UncleVanya** · 10/21/2011, 02:38 PM

T420 Lenovo Laptop running ie 8 - 3884.9ms
Same laptop running Firefox - 224.6ms
Same laptop running Chrome - 224.8ms

Wow...

Pre + with 800mhz profile = 14599.8ms (LOL)
iPhone 4 (Safari) = 10106.7ms (that score from the Pre + doesn't look so bad now...)
iPhone 4 (Opera Mini) = Fails - Hangs on one of the Math tests.

**ncinerate** · 10/21/2011, 02:40 PM

3.0.4 @ 1.5ghz on uberkernel: 2899
3.0.4 @ 1.5ghz on uberkernel NO FLASH: 2671

Not too shabby as that's reasonably comparable to dual 1.8ghz performance pre-patch.

**npmt** · 10/21/2011, 02:45 PM

uberkernel 1.5 ondemand 2878

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions