|
No regrets at all, aside from the sadness that HP never released the one device that was devoid of nearly every hardware problem of the past.
AT&T varies so much by geography, so I can't make a recommendation there. I will note that my data usage has been much higher than it ever was when I was on Sprint. It was the same story even when I was temporarily using an AT&T Pre Plus for about a week, and when I was using a Veer prior to my Pre3. I am fairly certain that the methods in which they calculate data are completely inconsistent with that of Sprint. That was just my own experience though, but it does make one wonder....?
That's my only caution, but hardly enough to avoid a Pre3. I say, take the plunge. 
EDIT: Was just thinking, perhaps it's not the calculation method of AT&T, but more driven by the network band differences & the efficiency of data transfer. Anyone with a background in this that can chime in? Am I alone in noticing the data usage difference between Sprint & AT&T?
|
|
|