02/21/2010, 04:13 AM
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Developer
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia - follow @webosinternals on Twitter visit www.webos-internals.org and www.facebook.com/webosinternals
Posts: 10,220
Likes Received: 546
Thanks: 90
Thanked 8,534 Times in 2,806 Posts
|
Quote:
Even better distribute it in a form where it must be explicitly enabled after each reboot so that those people who's processors come from the 500MHz speed bin instead of the 600MHz speed bin can reset their device to disable it instead of having to completely wipe and doctor the device as some people had to do with the 600MHz patches. Update: It looks like the issues I was concerned about have been taken into account from the start. I'm hopeful that this effort will result in a set of patches which don't need to go in the "Dangerous" category in Preware. -- Rod
__________________
WebOS Internals and Preware Founder and Developer You may wish to donate by Paypal to donations @ webos-internals.org if you find our work useful. All donations go back into development. www.webos-internals.org twitter.com/webosinternals facebook.com/webosinternals Last edited by rwhitby; 02/21/2010 at 02:31 PM. |
|
02/21/2010, 05:08 AM
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Likes Received: 1
Thanks: 19
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02/21/2010, 05:18 AM
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 158
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 3
Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts
|
Well, it should ideally still default to 500Mhz with the option to modify LunaSysMgr and the cpu_clock_speed to 720.
I'm assuming that an additional slot was added or the 600mhz slot replaced with 720.
__________________
Mobile photoblog http://post.jauderho.com/ |
02/21/2010, 11:37 AM
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,132
Likes Received: 154
Thanks: 453
Thanked 495 Times in 364 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
02/21/2010, 12:49 PM
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 435
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 60
Thanked 38 Times in 29 Posts
|
caj2008, is this just a kernel compiled to allow different options in scaling_available_frequencies, so that the actual speed can then be set as desired? That is what I was wanting... replace the 125000 option with 720000, etc.
|
02/21/2010, 01:08 PM
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 343
Likes Received: 7
Thanks: 20
Thanked 39 Times in 26 Posts
|
Quote:
But back on the subject, I have been runing at 600 also, no issue except faster battery drain and that is only because I browse the internet a lot. |
|
02/21/2010, 01:31 PM
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 422
Likes Received: 3
Thanks: 203
Thanked 97 Times in 68 Posts
|
I would like to hear from caj2008 on this issue. Is there any empirical data showing that 600MHz or higher will result in lower battery life? If so, what's the % decrease in expected battery drain that's directly attributable to running above 500MHz?
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|



