webOS Nation Forums >  Homebrew >  webOS patches > WebOS 2.x and 3.x behavior questions
WebOS 2.x and 3.x behavior questions

View Poll Results: Thoughts about these two patches
Side flick sounds useful 0 0%
I don't know what is a side flick, nor do I care. 0 0%
Side flick could be interesting, but not essential. 0 0%
I miss having small-card view as well! 2 66.67%
Small card view? Why would you want things smaller on those screens? 0 0%
Small card really doesn't make sense with stacking, they got rid of it for a reason. 1 33.33%
I like to push buttons. [push] 0 0%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08/28/2011, 01:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Likes Received: 4
Thanks: 48
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Question WebOS 2.x and 3.x behavior questions

I was wondering if it would be possible to patch back two behaviors from webOS 1.x into 2.x and/or 3.x

First, the ability to flick closed cards that are not the focused (centered) card, but either of the two on the periphery. This is something that I've grown quite accustomed to in using webOS 1.4.5 and rather like.

Second, the ability to restore the small-card view. This is called by tapping once below the cards in card view. This brings you to a very high-level zoomed out view. I know that 2.x and 3.x eschewed this in favor of stacking cards, but to be honest, ordering and stacking are incredibly obnoxious when multiple cards are open and you have to move one card at a time, instead of being able to interact with 3 full cards in focus, and two on the periphery.

So, the two patch requests sort of follow and augment the others.

Thanks for your time in reading!

Last edited by Saijin_Naib; 08/28/2011 at 02:11 AM.
Saijin_Naib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/29/2011, 09:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Likes Received: 4
Thanks: 48
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Anyone have any idea on feasibility if not desirability?
Saijin_Naib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/14/2011, 02:41 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Likes Received: 4
Thanks: 48
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Using my Pre2, it is becoming more clear to me that I miss these behaviors. Where are these defined? Something patchable or?

-- Sent from my Palm Pixi using Forums
Saijin_Naib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11/21/2011, 11:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Likes Received: 4
Thanks: 48
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Bump for visibility. Any further ideas on feasibility?
Saijin_Naib is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes



 


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0