Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1.    #1  
    I'd love to have an 800w, but sadly, it seems nowhere in sight. Like many of you, my Sprint 700W is long in the tooth. The slimmer form factor and higher resolution of the Moto Q look appealing. And there is a smartphone version of my must have app, Sling player. I realize I'd be giving up on the touchscreen, but I can maintain one-handed operation. Are there any other disadvantages I'm overlooking? How is memory? Can I still use TCMP?
  2. #2  
    I had the Sprint Moto Q9C for two weeks and its a great phone. Best battery, screen, keyboard and clarity on any phone I've owned thus far. If you can get past a non touch screen phone then go for it. Im referring to the Q9C and not the regular Q. That phone is crapola.
    ATT History- From 1997-2001-> Nokia 6362->Motorola StarTac->Nokia 8260.

    Nextel History From 2001-2004-> Motorola i1000-> Motorola i90c-> Motorola i95cl-> Motorola i730->Motorola i850.

    Sprint History From 2005 - Currently->Sanyo 5500-> Sanyo 5600-> Sanyo-> 7400->Sanyo 8300->Sanyo->7500-> Sanyo 9000->Sanyo 8400->Sanyo M1->PPC-6700->Treo 700wx->PPC-6800(Mogul)-> Motorola Q9C-> Treo 800w-> Curve->Treo 800w->Touch Pro->Treo Pro> Curve "M"->HTC Hero.
  3.    #3  
    My sense is that it won't take long to get accustomed to the lack of touchscreen, especially since I seldom take out the stylus.

    Does the current Sprint Q have ad2p? If not, will Hannip's mod work?
  4. #4  
    Yes, it supports AD2P. I missed the touchscreen for about 3 minutes when I made the switch. But I really love the smartphone, keyboard on top (non-slider) and the ease of use. If the world of hacks and Swiss Army Knife capabilities are not for you, give the Q9c a try. Otherwise, wait for the 800.
    It's not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change” - Darwin
  5. #5  
    I strongly considered it (the q9m) but I use terminal services fairly often (well, at least regularly and I can't see how that would work w/o a touchscreen unfortunately
  6. #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by hufn View Post
    I strongly considered it (the q9m) but I use terminal services fairly often (well, at least regularly and I can't see how that would work w/o a touchscreen unfortunately
    I wonder if the 'Think Outside' (mini) Bluetooth mouse works well on the Q. This might be a solution for applications which otherwise require a touchscreen.
  7. #7  
    ow - that would be quite a lot for regular use, but certainly an interesting suggestion

Posting Permissions