webOS Nation Forums >  webOS smartphones (Pre, Pixi, Veer) >  Palm Pre and Pre Plus > Is it better to Patch via Preware? or QI?
Is it better to Patch via Preware? or QI?

  Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01/27/2010, 03:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Funkadelick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 347
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 31
Thanked 14 Times in 8 Posts
Default Is it better to Patch via Preware? or QI?

I know they both have more or less the same stuff, pre ware obviously has alot more, but over the months since I've got this phone, I've EPR'd a few times, re-installed patches etc,. but sometimes things go astray

is there a diff. between each? what's better? is it better to stay consistent ?
Funkadelick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 03:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,305
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 8
Thanked 98 Times in 62 Posts
Default

preware
dkotoric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 03:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
JamesCarnley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 69
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 87
Thanked 31 Times in 21 Posts
Default

They will both be pretty much the same. Both of them will install and update your patches just fine. You should be able to switch between them easy enough now that the new patch infrastructure is in place.

Preware is much more convenient and easier to use. I use it just for that reason.
JamesCarnley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 03:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
irateb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Dec Shawty, GA
Posts: 265
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 90
Thanked 288 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Preware is more convenient, but if something goes wrong, you can normally use QI to bail you out before Doctoring or Repairing. QI also can "ftp" to and from the phone without needing a terminal for those quick one-off file transfers. IMO, keep using Preware, but keep QI nearby...
__________________
My 11 year Sprint journey:
Denso Touchpoint --> Samsung A500 --> Palm Treo 650 --> Palm Treo 700P --> Palm Treo 700P w/755P ROM hack --> Palm Pre --> Sprint Palm Pre Plus & unlocked AT&T Palm Pre Minus --> iPhone 4s
irateb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 03:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 916
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 94
Thanked 130 Times in 81 Posts
Default

I Prefer QI, To me it seems more stable and less prone to Patch removal errors. In any case I would recommend choosing one and sticking with it.
VickMackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 03:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Moderator
 
ChemEngr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,235
Likes Received: 13
Thanks: 158
Thanked 97 Times in 90 Posts
Default

Preware for convenience in mobile patching. wosqi for patching en-masse, command line, and fixing botched installs. I use both.
__________________
Palm III > Palm V > Palm Vx > (Sprint) Kyo 6035 > Handspring Treo 300
> Handspring Treo 600 Oct.'03 > Palm Treo 700P May'06 > Treo 755P Aug.'07 > Pre(-) June'09 + TouchPad July'11 LONG LIVE webOS!!!
ChemEngr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 04:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
DeathsArrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 289
Likes Received: 3
Thanks: 54
Thanked 43 Times in 32 Posts
Default

With AUPT (Auto Update Patch Technology), Preware is the way to go. OTA patch updates that can remain in place during WebOS updates.
DeathsArrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 04:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Moderator
 
ChemEngr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 2,235
Likes Received: 13
Thanks: 158
Thanked 97 Times in 90 Posts
Default

WOSQI will have AUPT in the very near future.
__________________
Palm III > Palm V > Palm Vx > (Sprint) Kyo 6035 > Handspring Treo 300
> Handspring Treo 600 Oct.'03 > Palm Treo 700P May'06 > Treo 755P Aug.'07 > Pre(-) June'09 + TouchPad July'11 LONG LIVE webOS!!!
ChemEngr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 05:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
RanGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: No.Va
Posts: 779
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 180
Thanked 99 Times in 59 Posts
Default

I mainly use Preware, but sometimes someone will post the IPK for an awesome patch that doesn't make it to Preware for a few days and i'll need WQI to put it on if I don't want to wait.
__________________
***I Twitter***

Stop complaining & start doing ---> Leave feedback/suggestions for Palm here
RanGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 06:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Western WI
Posts: 1,606
Likes Received: 76
Thanks: 108
Thanked 271 Times in 182 Posts
Default

I use Preware because this is a smartphone...it is not meant to be tied to a computer. WOSQI requires a usb connection to install anything while Preware does everything Over The Air (OTA).

Preware rocks!!
Mikey47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2010, 06:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Forum Moderator
 
OldSkoolVWLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 5,731
Likes Received: 529
Thanks: 486
Thanked 559 Times in 428 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChemEngr View Post
Preware for convenience in mobile patching. wosqi for patching en-masse, command line, and fixing botched installs. I use both.
exactly! Preware is great, but being somewhat comfortable with webosqi can save you from some mistakes or when something just doesn't go right.
OldSkoolVWLover is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

 

Tags
preware, quick install

Thread Tools
Display Modes



 


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0