|
|
09/12/2009, 12:48 PM
|
#242 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 74
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 18
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
Non-public API or not, it seems that Palm wants to avoid apps breaking during updates. I can understand that. Their decision is based on "quality".
However, I can easily findexamples of poor quality in their official app store: Accuweather - works well, but has anyone looked at its menus? Apparently there was no space bsr available to them during dev. Video Poker/Aces games - does spamming us with ads really make for quality? Ild take a quality media player like NaNplayer any day over some of that other stuff. Even if it broke post-update I'm sure there would be a quick fix. I suspect part of the reason for rejection may be due to Palm developing their own media app update as indicated on this site. |
09/12/2009, 01:15 PM
|
#244 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 74
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 18
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
I hear you re the spam, but that's not really my point.
On the one hand Palm is fine with apps that have 100% of their menus with typos, while at the same time they reject an app due to API reasons even though it is very polished. Also, let's be honest here: some app catalogue stuff is great, but some aren't exactly life-changing. Free - yes. Quality - meh. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|



