Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. Adjei's Avatar
    Posts
    277 Posts
    Global Posts
    708 Global Posts
       #21  
    Quote Originally Posted by rayln View Post
    this is adjei's second topic I've seen that's nothing but trolling.

    regardless, the survey is informal and the sample size for the pre is tiny.
    what standards did they use to choose which people would represent each platform?

    it's nice that people who bought the phones are each happy with their respective purchases but this doesn't really mean much at all.
    Which topic was my first trolling topic?
  2. #22  
    Nice. I told you guys he was a troll in another thread and look...
  3. kcs7272's Avatar
    Posts
    97 Posts
    Global Posts
    98 Global Posts
    #23  
    Quote Originally Posted by Adjei View Post
    LOL at some of these dudes. So what if the iphone is a 3rd generation, you should have told Palm to launch the Pre in 2007 then. I guess when the iphone is on its 5th generation, we still shouldn't be comparing it to the Pre.
    What I am trying to say is the Pre compares well to and excels in some areas compared to the Iphone and it is first gen.
  4. kabamm's Avatar
    Posts
    54 Posts
    Global Posts
    62 Global Posts
    #24  
    Sample size is statistically insignificant. This 'poll' is meaningless.
    "I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization." Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.
    __________________
    BB 850 -> BB 957 -> BB 7230 -> Treo 600 -> Treo 700p -> BB 8330 -> Palm Pre -> ?
  5. #25  
    Quote Originally Posted by kabamm View Post
    Sample size is statistically insignificant. This 'troll' is meaningless.
    Fixed.
  6. #26  
    In all fairness, you can gain a statistically significant difference with a sample size of 40.

    Statistics has ways to correct for differing sample sizes.
  7. #27  
    Another thread going nowhere fast.

    <<closed>>
    Just call me Berd.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions