Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1.    #1  
    BillShrink.com concludes that the Pre is much cheaper to own than the iPhone 3Gs or the G1. Also provides a chart with a basic feature comparison.

    Total Cost of Ownership: iPhone 3G S versus Palm Pre versus Android G1 | Shrinkage Is Good
  2. shadrap's Avatar
    Posts
    161 Posts
    Global Posts
    308 Global Posts
    #2  
    Good find.
  3. #3  
    Nicely sums up why I've always stuck with Sprint. Cost of ownership is higher enough on ATT that it's not worth it (to me at least) to have a flashier device. I understand this all is relative to your personal budget but it's the case for me at least.
  4. dpc
    dpc is offline
    dpc's Avatar
    Posts
    433 Posts
    Global Posts
    439 Global Posts
    #4  
    hey his chart says the pre does voice commands, is that right?
  5. xGORDOx's Avatar
    Posts
    68 Posts
    Global Posts
    74 Global Posts
    #5  
    The first comment was funny.

    "I’m still thinking the iPhone is more worth it. It is just better and the price isn’t that much different."

    I dunno dude, $1200 a year is much different in my household.
  6. #6  
    There are many mistakes in that chart

    First, they should probably clarify that the 3Gs does not have MMS just yet. Users are at the mercy of AT&T to activate that, and you know how those things go.

    The pre does not have voice commands.

    The pre does not do OTA downloads for amazon MP3's, I believe. I think you have to be on wifi.
  7. sevink's Avatar
    Posts
    35 Posts
    Global Posts
    57 Global Posts
    #7  
    Jesus christ people are flocking to defend the iPhone in the comments, people don't like cold hard facts.

Posting Permissions