06/04/2009, 10:11 AM
|
#61 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,144
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 82
Thanked 60 Times in 41 Posts
|
And the article is the focus of the front page of the Personal Journal in WSJ today. Huge picture of the device.
__________________
It's not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change” - Darwin |
06/04/2009, 10:14 AM
|
#62 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 443
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
Internet use: Up to 5 hours on 3G Up to 6 hours on Wi-Fi
__________________
LG TP 1100 -> Sanyo SCP-5150 -> LG PM-325 -> Nokia 1100 -> Motorola v557 -> Treo 755p -> HTC EVO 4G Sprint customer since 2001
|
|
06/04/2009, 10:20 AM
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Posts: 3,387
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 1
Thanked 148 Times in 90 Posts
|
Hmm, and here I always thought the Moss was farily savvy with technology, but his comment:
But on at least one day, it died in midafternoon, even though I was using Wi-Fi most of that day and not the power-hungry cellphone network is idiotic. Unless he turned off the phone, which I doubt, using wi-fi means TWO radios are running, including the power hungry cell network. Sheesh!
__________________
Bob Meyer I'm out of my mind. But feel free to leave a message. |
06/04/2009, 02:14 PM
|
#64 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: West Simsbury, CT
Posts: 1,907
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() It's funny you say that I can't have it both ways, because I think that's what Palm is trying to do. They're trying to copy Apple while adding in a keyboard. The type of screen technology that the iPhone and pre use require touching things with the pad of your finger, so they don't offer the accuracy that the old screens which supported a stylus or fingernail could offer. IMO, the smaller size of the pre's screen (with the same resolution as an iPhone) is going to make mis-hitting things more common. If they're going to have a finger-focused interface, they should have made the screen larger and dropped the keyboard altogether, IMO. That said, the reviews I've read thus far have not raised that as an issue, so maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised. As far as efficiency/usability is concerned, the wave bar is a fine substitute for the dedicated app buttons. But the tile app launcher is a very poor/inefficient substitute for the launchers we currently have. As for the cards and multitasking...I'm all for multitasking, but the cards concept seems more like eye-candy to me. I use Hi-Launcher on my Treo as a simplified "recently used apps" list and that offers a more efficient method to jump back to my most recently used apps than the cards look to offer. With the cards, I'll bring up that list, then may have to swipe around a few times to get to the one I want. And I personally think that scrolling through a web page and the links on that page is better with a D-Pad. Moving through other types of "cells" onscreen (e.g., spreadsheet) would also be more accurate with a D-Pad. If I'm composing an email, I type in the subject line, and the "To" fields, etc., how am I moving from field to field on the pre without a D-Pad? Do I have to tap on the screen to go from field to field? I imagine they allow for using the "enter" key to move down, but what if I want to move back up? I've forgotten how app-specific menus work on the pre...can someone remind me? On the Treo, I like having a dedicated menu button (which I remapped to the green key when Palm erroneously relegated this back to a tiny key in the most hard-to-reach spot of the keyboard).
__________________
Now THIS is the future of smartphones. |
|
06/04/2009, 02:27 PM
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,786
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 370
Thanked 372 Times in 238 Posts
|
I hear ya. Another reason why folks sometimes still mix this up is they either run their phone on the cell network radio or they run their phone on the cell network radio AND wifi. Users typically don't turn off their phone radio to run wifi so it would inaccurately appear that wifi consumes more power than the phone radio.
|
06/04/2009, 02:35 PM
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,786
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 370
Thanked 372 Times in 238 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
06/04/2009, 02:45 PM
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 443
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
LG TP 1100 -> Sanyo SCP-5150 -> LG PM-325 -> Nokia 1100 -> Motorola v557 -> Treo 755p -> HTC EVO 4G Sprint customer since 2001
Last edited by EeZeEpEe; 06/04/2009 at 02:53 PM. |
|
06/04/2009, 02:49 PM
|
#68 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: West Simsbury, CT
Posts: 1,907
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
Walt probably had his cell radio on, but as Kupe said, we really can't know for sure. If he was inside of a building with poor/no coverage, he was draining his battery even more, as the lower the signal the harder it works to find one. Personally, I like Walt because, like me, he tends to put an emphasis on usability/efficiency. I would never look to one of his "reviews" for detailed information about every facet of the device, least of all specific battery life times, as I suspect he doesn't use any scientific method for measuring battery life.
__________________
Now THIS is the future of smartphones. |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|



