Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 79
  1.    #1  
    Everything seems very nice, but how Fat/thick is this?
  2. #2  
    a bit thicker then the iphone i believe due to the keyboard.
  3.    #3  
    Is there an direct comparison picture?

    thanks
  4. #4  
    It's 16.95 mm (0.67 inches) thick it's thicker than the iPhone (12.3 mm) but thinner than the Centro (18.54 mm). Overall, I'd say it's going to be acceptably small and if Palm's history of design is any indication, it will fit in the hand just right.
    "'Form follows function' — that has been misunderstood. Form and function should be one, joined in a spiritual union."
    Frank Lloyd Wright
  5. #5  
    Quote Originally Posted by Pre_Diction View Post
    Is there an direct comparison picture?

    thanks
    I have not seen any of the edge-on stacked pics that would be needed to make an appropriate comparison.
    "'Form follows function' — that has been misunderstood. Form and function should be one, joined in a spiritual union."
    Frank Lloyd Wright
  6. joelpalm
    joelpalm's Avatar
    #6  
    The reviews have said it feels great in the hand and yes only slightly thicker than the iphone.
  7. Zyphlin's Avatar
    Posts
    564 Posts
    Global Posts
    565 Global Posts
    #7  
    Thickness wise it seems about on par with my Touch Diamond which is far from a thick phone. Its thinner than a Touch Pro I believe, which is right past the "too big" line for me.
  8. #8  
    Is the Pre too Fat?
    NO!
  9.    #9  
    Any slider I feel is bulgy. But I think I'm wrong here.
  10. #10  
    Quote Originally Posted by johncc View Post
    NO!
    +1
  11. #11  
    Hell... here we go again.

    There is something as being too thin. Worse is this obsession with thin-ness.
  12. #12  
    Life's too short to date own fat chicks phones.
    Pixi: Sold. Pre: Passed off to another rep. Touchpad: Just a toy until Cloud syncing arrives, and a better doc editor.
  13. #13  
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenHex View Post
    Hell... here we go again.

    There is something as being too thin. Worse is this obsession with thin-ness.
  14. #14  
    I am thinking of my old brick phone. Now that was too fat.
    My Phone & My Wife's Phone Two Unlocked GSM Treo Pro's

  15. #15  


    That, is too fat.
    Palm History: Palm III>IIIc>CLIÉ NR70v>CLIÉ TG50>Tungsten C>Treo 650>Treo 700p>Centro>Pre!! 6/5/09
    Phone History: Way too long

    Sorry Timmy, SERO does not work with the Pre.
    If you have an iTouch click me.
  16. #16  
    Quote Originally Posted by Eguy View Post


    That, is too fat.
    LOL! that looks exactly like my old brick phone.

    I had it stolen out of my cart at a Home Depot. Then the nut who stole it, starting calling the 10 numbers I had stored on it asking what the reward was for finding it.
    My Phone & My Wife's Phone Two Unlocked GSM Treo Pro's

  17. #17  
    I have read that being thick is actually more important than being long.
  18. #18  
    Quote Originally Posted by Twisted-D View Post
    I have read that being thick is actually more important than being long.

    Are we talking about a phone here twisted?
  19. #19  
    Quote Originally Posted by Eguy View Post


    That, is too fat.
    How DARE you sir! My father was a TELECOM!
  20. #20  
    A little bit of well placed 'thickness' can help it fit the hand much better!
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions