Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 36 of 36
Like Tree16Likes
  1. #21  
    Quote Originally Posted by Grabber5.0 View Post
    First thing I'd ask is if they even want to entertain such a thing. Ideas like this should come from those doing the work.
    It may be that webOS-Ports are happy to use that designation for their product or it may be that they have some other cool sounding name for it already. That is of course, their choice.

    But, if they think of giving a particular name to this release and have nothing in particular in mind - a competition is fun, generates interest and can often produce pretty good ideas. They have already run a competition for an image. You may also remember that webOS onTap ran a competititon. Homebrew Pivot ready for a name [poll] | webOS Nation

    It's just an idea. The ports team may like it or not - it's entirely up to them.
    railbear007 likes this.
  2.    #22  
    Quote Originally Posted by Preemptive View Post
    It may be that webOS-Ports are happy to use that designation for their product or it may be that they have some other cool sounding name for it already. That is of course, their choice.

    But, if they think of giving a particular name to this release and have nothing in particular in mind - a competition is fun, generates interest and can often produce pretty good ideas. They have already run a competition for an image. You may also remember that webOS onTap ran a competititon. Homebrew Pivot ready for a name [poll] | webOS Nation

    It's just an idea. The ports team may like it or not - it's entirely up to them.
    I agree with Preemptive it should be up to them. I sent a tweet to @webosports asking them to swing by if they want to come check out this tread.
  3.    #23  
    Also preemptive, I hope your ok with me using a bean bird as my avatar too... if you dont like it ill be happy to change it
  4. #24  
    IMHO...

    i've always differentiated between webOS and OWOS.

    it's definitely up to the developers to name their projects, not us spectators.

    for ease of conversation though, which is all i think the OP was suggesting, we here on the forum can certainly agree on there being:
    - legacy webOS - 1.x to 3.x on existing devices
    - LG webOS - announced at CES this week
    - OWOS - the foundation code that Ports is working to adapt to Android environment.
    - webOS CE - Ports build that brings LunaCE to the TP

    Please advise if i'm OVERsimplifying this.
  5. #25  
    Quote Originally Posted by TJs11thPre View Post
    IMHO...

    i've always differentiated between webOS and OWOS.

    it's definitely up to the developers to name their projects, not us spectators.

    for ease of conversation though, which is all i think the OP was suggesting, we here on the forum can certainly agree on there being:
    - legacy webOS - 1.x to 3.x on existing devices
    - LG webOS - announced at CES this week
    - OWOS - the foundation code that Ports is working to adapt to Android environment.
    - webOS CE - Ports build that brings LunaCE to the TP

    Please advise if i'm OVERsimplifying this.
    I don't know if LunaCE counts as the whole OS and you missed out webOS-Ports (as it is called!) which I understand to be essentially a fork of Open webOS.

    Open webOS will run on a Linux PC - which isn't much good for a mobile OS. The amount of work the Ports team has had to put in - not to mention the whole libhybris thing - to get webOS back onto mobile has meant significant code changes...
    Last edited by Preemptive; 01/08/2014 at 01:45 AM.
  6. #26  
    Quote Originally Posted by railbear007 View Post
    Also preemptive, I hope your ok with me using a bean bird as my avatar too... if you dont like it ill be happy to change it
    I neither invented nor own Bean Bird! ;-) Do what you like.

    I did start a Bean Bird fan club thread! I expect to split the community down the middle into lovers & haters. ;-o
    TJs11thPre likes this.
  7. #27  
    Quote Originally Posted by TJs11thPre View Post
    IMHO...

    i've always differentiated between webOS and OWOS.

    it's definitely up to the developers to name their projects, not us spectators.

    for ease of conversation though, which is all i think the OP was suggesting, we here on the forum can certainly agree on there being:
    - legacy webOS - 1.x to 3.x on existing devices
    - LG webOS - announced at CES this week
    - OWOS - the foundation code that Ports is working to adapt to Android environment.
    - webOS CE - Ports build that brings LunaCE to the TP

    Please advise if i'm OVERsimplifying this.
    LunaCE is only a modified version of the open sourced 3.0.5 LunaSysMgr.

    webOS Ports Open webOS is indeed a long name and actually a fork of Open webOS with a rewritten LunaSysMgr called Luna Next. Discussions are ongoing behind the screens about a more proper name for this for a while already. An announcement will be made in due course by the Ports team.
    Last edited by Herrie; 01/08/2014 at 04:19 AM.
    HP Veer (daily driver), HP Pre 3, HP Touchpad Proper 4G/LTE (Sierra MC7710), HP Touchpad 32GB WiFi, Palm Pre 2
    railbear007 and Rnp like this.
  8. #28  
    Quote Originally Posted by Preemptive View Post
    I don't know if LunaCE counts as the whole OS and you missed out webOS-Ports (as it is called!) which I understand to be essentially a fork of Open webOS.
    .
    sorry, i didn't mean to suggest that webOS CE was something significantly more unique than original webOS with the LunaCE customizations. (which is what i read and hopefully interpreted right)
    Quote Originally Posted by Preemptive View Post
    Open webOS will run on a Linux PC - which isn't much good for a mobile OS. The amount of work the Ports team has had to put in - not to mention the whole libhybris thing - to get webOS back onto mobile has meant significant code changes...
    i didn't know how to describe the Ports product, other than not referring to it as simply OWOS, which would be incorrect. Hopefully someday there will be a consumer-grade product to load onto a Droid device. If so, would it be called webOS Ports? this may be our best hope for a 4G webOS experience. (or is that off-mark?)
  9. #29  
    Quote Originally Posted by TJs11thPre View Post
    sorry, i didn't mean to suggest that webOS CE was something significantly more unique than original webOS with the LunaCE customizations. (which is what i read and hopefully interpreted right)


    i didn't know how to describe the Ports product, other than not referring to it as simply OWOS, which would be incorrect. Hopefully someday there will be a consumer-grade product to load onto a Droid device. If so, would it be called webOS Ports? this may be our best hope for a 4G webOS experience. (or is that off-mark?)
    I think the chance of an LG webOS phone is better than ever. But that doesn't mean it will actually happen.

    So, the Porting team remain our best hope - they are the only ones I know of working to get webOS on new hardware. I guess depending on libhybris drivers, LTE may be available 'out of the box' on the Gnex. If not, I suspect that if the ports team deliver something with basic functionality, there are plenty of people who will start offering additional code to add features - just like on the original products.
  10. #30  
    Quote Originally Posted by Preemptive View Post
    I think the chance of an LG webOS phone is better than ever. But that doesn't mean it will actually happen.

    So, the Porting team remain our best hope - they are the only ones I know of working to get webOS on new hardware. I guess depending on libhybris drivers, LTE may be available 'out of the box' on the Gnex. If not, I suspect that if the ports team deliver something with basic functionality, there are plenty of people who will start offering additional code to add features - just like on the original products.
    LTE is not available, hardware wise, on the Galaxy Nexus.

    An LTE radio is built into the Nexus 4, but it never passed certification with any gov't agency. There are hacks to enable LTE on the Nexus 4. As they are not strictly legal to run, I doubt Ports would use them if/when they move on to the N4 for a webOS port.

    You have to advance to Nexus 5 for LTE.
    Lumia 1520.3 (the Beastly Unicorn): Windows 10 Mobile

    Windows Central Senior Ambassador

    Mobile Nations Devotee
  11. #31  
    Quote Originally Posted by RumoredNow View Post
    LTE is not available, hardware wise, on the Galaxy Nexus.

    An LTE radio is built into the Nexus 4, but it never passed certification with any gov't agency. There are hacks to enable LTE on the Nexus 4. As they are not strictly legal to run, I doubt Ports would use them if/when they move on to the N4 for a webOS port.

    You have to advance to Nexus 5 for LTE.
    as LTE works?

    Enviado desde mi Wildfire S usando Tapatalk 2
  12. #32  
    Oh, I looked here:
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250 - Full phone specifications

    I was surprised to see 4G in a phone that's a bit older, so maybe it's an error.
  13. #33  
    Quote Originally Posted by joshua764 View Post
    as LTE works?

    Enviado desde mi Wildfire S usando Tapatalk 2
    I'm not sure what the question is directed at...


    Quote Originally Posted by Preemptive View Post
    Oh, I looked here:
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus I9250 - Full phone specifications

    I was surprised to see 4G in a phone that's a bit older, so maybe it's an error.
    That LTE 2300/2400 band is type 30/40 which has very few deployments worldwide. Technically there is LTE for certain Galaxy Nexus variants (if you can find one), but effectively your LTE coverage would be limited to small parts of Russia, India and Australia - plus places like Hong Kong, Oman, Sri Lanka and Saudi Arabia. That's some pretty specific areas.

    The theory behind type 30/40 inclusion might have been based on AT&T having rights to type 30 in the US. They never deployed for LTE on that spectrum though.

    E-UTRA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Lumia 1520.3 (the Beastly Unicorn): Windows 10 Mobile

    Windows Central Senior Ambassador

    Mobile Nations Devotee
  14.    #34  
    I got in contact with the ports guys and they said this" <+rwhitby> railbear007_: there is already a name chosen for alpha 3. thanks for thinking of ways to get the community more engaged.
    [18:15] <+rwhitby> (the name is to be released at the same time as the code)"
    I'm excited! Hope its a name that can be branded well
  15. #35  
    I gave up my Pre3 for a GNex over a year ago now. While I am excited for LG webOS, I committed to open webOS (ports) early and I have fun testing whatever they release.

    And I get to learn something in the process.
    This space for rent or lease. Inquire within.
  16. #36  
    maybe can we have a contest for the name n a logo? lol
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. What is the difference between open webos and the original webos?
    By dokha in forum Open webOS General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05/26/2013, 08:39 PM
  2. webOS Apps on Open webOS?
    By bubbatannous1 in forum Open webOS General Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 02/13/2013, 07:59 PM
  3. What can we make of this open-embedded core business for Open webOS?
    By dr3wster in forum Open webOS General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09/02/2012, 12:11 PM
  4. Open webOS - Improved webOS?
    By cvendra in forum Open webOS General Discussion
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 05/29/2012, 05:54 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06/15/2009, 08:45 PM

Posting Permissions