Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
Like Tree8Likes
  1.    #1  
    Wasn't webOS under HP's control supposed to make a computer with webOS on it? I think that it would be pretty awesome.
    HP Think Beyond event link
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnjwG...dwMIQ&index=31
    If You Have A WindsorNot Hit Me Up
  2. #2  
    Quote Originally Posted by boovish View Post
    Wasn't webOS under HP's control supposed to make a computer with webOS on it? I think that it would be pretty awesome.
    One of these with webOS running natively would be killer:

    Overview :: HP TouchSmart | HP® Official Store

    I think they actually used one of these running Open webOS beta (the Ubuntu port) in one of the demo videos.
  3. #3  
    Actually the OWS concept with it's Linux foundation (Ubuntu) - if HP or someone can get a proper install running as an alternative to Win 8 can be a winner.
    Pros
    a. it's resource light
    b. very good multitasking concept
    c. good for smaller devices
    d. will provide good battery life
    e. Would work for both touch screen and (mouse / pad) devices.

    Cons
    a. Current reiteration OWS 1.0 needs work in it's core features - calender, mail, (no synergy).
    b. No productivity tools - not sure if the Webos Prod apps will work on OWS?

    Challenges
    a. Drivers -for 3D acceleration, Wifi and others..
    b. Must work on quite a number of laptops - or at least common devices (which is related to drivers)

    I wouldn't mind trying this on a Ultra-light x86 device and see how it runs, if we have a bootable USB OWS.
  4. #4  
    To be useful as a desktop device, the apps need to be less mobile oriented and more heavy duty. Like a full office suite capable of creating lots of graphics instead of only being able to read and write text; a graphics program that you can freely add filters and has a bunch of tools; and a real developer environment where you can write code. webOS was designed for mobile, and while it's nice and clean and good for that purpose, to work on the desktop you need real apps and not cut down versions.
  5. #5  
    Even at its best, webOS' app selection was and still is unbearably weak for actual productivity applications. And it continues to get even weaker the more developers walk away from the applications--no matter what kind--they've developed over the past few years with nobody coming in to fill the void except magical developers from the future that will of course make it all better.

    webOS is a nice proof-of-concept for touchscreen-based desktop computers, but in no way, shape, or form will it ever be able to compare to Windows in just about any area you can think of. There's simply no comparison to be had here, and in no way will it ever come close on its best day to even the ancient Windows 3.1 on its worst day in terms of overall developer support and application variety.
    Last edited by dignitary; 10/23/2012 at 11:15 PM.
  6. #6  
    I think a more pertinent question is "Why put webos on a computer?"

    I don't see a need. I don't see it as better then windows 7 (which i use now). It doesn't offer something i don't get on windows already. And in the beginning it surely lacks the software. Plus it's a touch screen OS and when i look at Window 8 changes i feel the same way when i see windows 8, "Why would i want all that metro touch screen stuff on my laptop?" Even for Microsoft i don't get it and i think the meshing of the two is a mistake. In fact, seeing windows 8, made me certain that i'd switch back to a macbook. And come to think of it, its not like there are no other operating systems for desktops outside of windows like linux. So again doesn't seem to have much over those. I don't know tech or hardware stuff but i thought i read somewhere that open webos couldn't run such and such a processor. Not sure how true that is but if true it may also be a hurdle to get it running on all the various hardware, processors, motherboards, graphics cards, old hardware, new hardware etc that exits?

    I don't see anything wrong with putting webos on a computer just to do it. But for my needs its slightly above the HP's idea of putting it on a printer. to both i just say, "Why?"
    You come at the king. You best not miss.
  7. cgk
    cgk is offline
    cgk's Avatar
    Posts
    3,868 Posts
    Global Posts
    9,494 Global Posts
    #7  
    WebOS on the desktop is a solution looking for a problem.
    xandros9 likes this.
  8. #8  
    i say just replace metro with webos. whenever the user hits the windows key on the keyboard, up pops webos en yo face and you can't do a thing about it. JUST TYPE FTW
    Neo Enyo 2.0 Twitter App: NOW AVAILABLE | WON REVIEW
    clearview - clear card app for HP TOUCHPAD
    Wild'n Video Poker - AVAILABLE FOR ALL WEBOS DEVICES! | follow for latest updates - @fxspec06

  9. #9  
    Quote Originally Posted by fxspec06 View Post
    i say just replace metro with webos. whenever the user hits the windows key on the keyboard, up pops webos en yo face and you can't do a thing about it. JUST TYPE FTW
    Hmm... Just Type on Windows would be helpful, as long as the indexer is much better than the one in Windows and actually index code files. I always have a need to quickly open the Command Prompt and calculator. (Say, why does Microsoft think code files are not real files? If a user doesn't program, they won't have them on their computer in the first place. Index them by default already!)
  10. #10  
    webOS on a computer? It already is! Your phone is a computer!! :P

    Ok, literal joking aside... webOS really is just Rockhopper Linux+Luna Desktop Manager (that happens to use WebKit for UI display). This is synonymous with Ubuntu Linux + Gnome Shell (that happens to use GTK+ for UI display). So, in all reality, it makes perfect sense to run webOS on a desktop. Frankly, I want my desktop to run webOS. And, one could add support for running QT (well, that should already be supported) and GTK+ apps. I want to add support for offline HTML5 apps (that aren't webOS packaged).

    So, in all reality, Luna is just a window manager ontop of a distro of Linux, just like Gnome. Except Luna is more gesture oriented, and started off by running web apps.

    Ultimately, my goal is to have a laptop running Luna that lets me run all types of LInux apps. But... this is a long term goal. At the moment, as one can see, open webOS is barely even usable on a phone, let alone a computer.

    Don't doubt the power of Linux, even if it started on a phone.
    Did you know:

    webOS ran on a Treo 800 during initial development.
  11. #11  
    Quote Originally Posted by GMMan View Post
    To be useful as a desktop device, the apps need to be less mobile oriented and more heavy duty. Like a full office suite capable of creating lots of graphics instead of only being able to read and write text; a graphics program that you can freely add filters and has a bunch of tools; and a real developer environment where you can write code. webOS was designed for mobile, and while it's nice and clean and good for that purpose, to work on the desktop you need real apps and not cut down versions.
    I wasn't imagining webos on a desktop in the conventional sense, and it certainly wouldn't/couldn't replace window 7 for real work, but rather in the niche of touchscreen PC's like those in the link I posted. I imagine something along the lines of inexpensive minimal hardware essentially just for the same light duty tasks you'd perform on a Touchpad but on the comfort of a larger screen (casual web surfing, email, photo browsing, videos, light games, etc.). I could see it being useful in a kitchen or other sitting area, or contained in a kiosk for commercial use. Having the ability to install it on older existing hardware as a dual-boot option would be just dandy enough.
  12. #12  
    There's little reason it can't run existent Linux applications and programs with a bit of work... Unless I'm completely mistaken. There is a whole lot of productivity out there waiting to be plugged in.

    Don't forget to look at Penk"s Live Distro (http://forums.webosnation.com/webos-...ktop-demo.html) for an idea of how it would look and feel.

    Plus if the market moves to Touch Panel (and why wouldn't it???) then webOS is a natural fit.

    The future is integration across surfaces and activities:

    [YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38[/YT]
    Lumia 1520.3 (the Beastly Unicorn): Windows 10 Mobile

    Windows Central Senior Ambassador

    Mobile Nations Devotee
  13.    #13  
    Oh my. I'm gone for most of the day and so many replies

    Anyway I was saying this because now that PC manufacturers think that they get away with windows 8 extralarge tablets with attachable keyboards for computers. webOS would be perfect all it needs is a new app suite
    HP Think Beyond event link
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnjwG...dwMIQ&index=31
    If You Have A WindsorNot Hit Me Up
  14. #14  
    Quote Originally Posted by dkirker View Post
    And, one could add support for running QT (well, that should already be supported) and GTK+ apps.
    open webOS is built using Qt
    The Open webOS Project Blog, Open webOS July Edition
  15. #15  
    Quote Originally Posted by sq5 View Post
    One of these with webOS running natively would be killer:

    Overview :: HP TouchSmart | HP® Official Store

    I think they actually used one of these running Open webOS beta (the Ubuntu port) in one of the demo videos.
    yep.
    [YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sy_MWog3ltw[/YT]
  16. i2y4n's Avatar
    Posts
    278 Posts
    Global Posts
    294 Global Posts
    #16  
    When I think of webOS on a computer I don't think of webOS replacing the operating system. The main thing that I would like to see come out of a computer with webOS is heavy synergy integration and unobtrusive notifications.

    I really enjoy the way webOS phones and tablets can share messages back and forth, why not also expand that onto your computer. A usage situation: Your out of your house and you have your phone on you. You walk into your house and set your phone on the wireless charger and hop onto your computer. A friend calls or messages you and a notification pops up on your computer monitor. Without getting up you can immediately respond to the message.

    Mail and Calendar can be synced across all your devices. All your accounts from Facebook, Google, Microsoft, etc.

    Better cloud sync could further enhance the experience between multiple devices.

    HP's own computer app store full of games and all.

    ....

    I see lots of potential with a webOS computer, but I think it should be an enhancement to the existing OS and not an OS re-write.
    fxspec06 likes this.
  17. #17  
    Quote Originally Posted by dkirker View Post
    webOS really is just Rockhopper Linux+Luna Desktop Manager (that happens to use WebKit for UI display). This is synonymous with Ubuntu Linux + Gnome Shell (that happens to use GTK+ for UI display). So, in all reality, it makes perfect sense to run webOS on a desktop. Frankly, I want my desktop to run webOS. And, one could add support for running QT (well, that should already be supported) and GTK+ apps. I want to add support for offline HTML5 apps (that aren't webOS packaged).

    So, in all reality, Luna is just a window manager ontop of a distro of Linux, just like Gnome. Except Luna is more gesture oriented, and started off by running web apps.
    lol. i didn't understand a word of that. My brain reads whatever you said as though you were speaking Klingon. tech talk is over my head.
    You come at the king. You best not miss.
  18. #18  
    Quote Originally Posted by hrminer92 View Post
    Indeed it is. And WebKit is QT under open webOS. The QT build environment has been one of the major hurdles that I am facing getting Isis on the TouchPad... (Not because it isn't useful, it is just... new... and BIG...)
    Did you know:

    webOS ran on a Treo 800 during initial development.
  19. #19  
    Quote Originally Posted by dkirker View Post
    webOS on a computer? It already is! Your phone is a computer!! :P

    Ok, literal joking aside... webOS really is just Rockhopper Linux+Luna Desktop Manager (that happens to use WebKit for UI display). This is synonymous with Ubuntu Linux + Gnome Shell (that happens to use GTK+ for UI display). So, in all reality, it makes perfect sense to run webOS on a desktop. Frankly, I want my desktop to run webOS. And, one could add support for running QT (well, that should already be supported) and GTK+ apps. I want to add support for offline HTML5 apps (that aren't webOS packaged).

    So, in all reality, Luna is just a window manager ontop of a distro of Linux, just like Gnome. Except Luna is more gesture oriented, and started off by running web apps.

    Ultimately, my goal is to have a laptop running Luna that lets me run all types of LInux apps. But... this is a long term goal. At the moment, as one can see, open webOS is barely even usable on a phone, let alone a computer.

    Don't doubt the power of Linux, even if it started on a phone.
    I'm just wondering, but have you tried GNOME 3?
  20. #20  
    In a way, Android on pc would have much more sense than open WebOS. Android's desktop already has ability for shortcuts and folders but system lacks in graphical presentation of multitasking. WebOS on other hand has cards, but it's desktop is for now unusable.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions