Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 53
Like Tree21Likes
  1. #21  
    Quote Originally Posted by milominderbinder View Post
    webOS is closed source. Rod and others have explained that they cannot port copy protected software without a license.

    Android on the other hand is open source so those apps could be ported to the webOS hardware.
    Not any more Milo!
    I don't understand the purpose of the line, “I don't need to drink to have fun.” Great, no one does. But why start a fire with flint and sticks when they've invented the lighter?

    Let's all give thanks to the app that started it all.
    http://forums.precentral.net/homebre...ebrew-app.html
    un_designer, jeffmcc and Soorma like this.
  2. #22  
    As a developer, albiet a non-Linux/LAMP dev, the open-sourcing of WebOS could go bad.

    Android has the backing of Google, and Google "sells"/convinces OEMs to adopt Android (for obvious reasons; advertising). WebOS does not have that support base anymore, or a major organization promoting it.

    It will take a sizable grass-roots effort to evangelize the platform. The porters/modders/etc... will not be able to match Google's or Microsoft's push at the OEM level. That would leave end-users as the only attainable audience (it can be done.... look at Apple in 1997, which primarily sells to end users).

    And there in lies the quagmire .... end users have never embraced Linux.

    1. WebOS needs to be ported over for specific use on existing and future Android tablets.
    2. The process of 'doctoring' the Android devices needs to be easy, with the appropriate measures to not brick the device, and recovery methods. (who would be liable if someone bricks their device trying to install an unauthorized OS?)
    3. Support. This will be crucial. Forums such as these are invaluable.
    4.APIs and apps. more.

    Unfortunately, I am pessimistic on the prospects and chances for success. Open-sourcing WebOS essentially means that WebOS now has no corporate backing in the marketplace, not Palm and not HP. WebOS has been put out to pasture, with no financial incentive for anyone to take ownership and responsibility for it's success. I hope i am proved wrong
  3. #23  
    You must have missed the part where HP was still behind it.
  4. #24  
    You must have missed the part where HP was still behind it.

    That's right for the next year or two. But if nobody (and as nobody I mean OEMs) steps in, HP will fly too.


    -- Sent from my TouchPad using Communities
    Last edited by deCorvett; 12/10/2011 at 08:50 AM.
    Newness Developments apps:

  5. #25  
    Quote Originally Posted by deCorvett View Post
    That's right for the next year or two. But if nobody (and as nobody I mean OEMs) steps in, HP will fly too.


    -- Sent from my TouchPad using Communities
    Based on all the talks between HP and OEMs, I believe this was the understood plan to open source so they all will be able to adopt webOS ie; Amazon, HTC, facebook, Samsung, etc. I think we will see these companies start introducing webOS phone within the next 6 months or at least make an announcement.

    Meg also mentioned a 4-5yr time frame for support for webOS in which they WILL invest time and resources for continue support. They will keep the webOS software team in place as they create a new plan to move forward.
  6. #26  
    Quote Originally Posted by RoverNole View Post
    Based on all the talks between HP and OEMs, I believe this was the understood plan to open source so they all will be able to adopt webOS ie; Amazon, HTC, facebook, Samsung, etc. I think we will see these companies start introducing webOS phone within the next 6 months or at least make an announcement.

    Meg also mentioned a 4-5yr time frame for support for webOS in which they WILL invest time and resources for continue support. They will keep the webOS software team in place as they create a new plan to move forward.
    hmmn there is 6 spaces on that opensource committee--3 for hp and 1 each for other manufacturers?
  7. konner920's Avatar
    Posts
    26 Posts
    Global Posts
    33 Global Posts
    #27  
    I really wanna see it ported over to the Droid Incredible 2. The Pre 3 uses the same processor and GPU as the Dinc2. :3
  8. #28  
    Quote Originally Posted by Tikerz View Post
    Then after that, it only runs on specific Qualcomm CPUs.
    Original Pre and Pre 2 had TI OMAPs, 3430 and 360.

    And the CPU on the Veer and Pre3 aren't anything THAT special.

    Pre 3 uses the MSM8255T which is also found in the Samsung Galaxy W and Sony Xperia Arc
    Veer uses the MSM7230 which is also found in the HTC Desire Z
    Palm IIIc -> Sony CLIÉ T650C -> Sony TJ-37 -> Palm TX -> Palm Centro -> Palm Pre Bell -> Palm Pre Plus Bell/Verizon Hybrid -> HP Veer -> HP Pre 3 NA -> BlackBerry Classic -> BlackBerry Priv

    It's a Late Goodbye, such a Late Goodbye.

    Need OEM Palm Pre parts? See here
  9. #29  
    <zombie thread moved to the new OpenSource forums>
    jeffmcc likes this.
  10. BBooDad's Avatar
    Posts
    406 Posts
    Global Posts
    541 Global Posts
    #30  
    Until they let TouchPad crew go after 1st Q 2012, as reported elsewhere. an OS w/o current hardware is dead.


    - Sent from my HP webOS TouchPad using Communities -
    -
    - my webOS apps: Bishop Scores, EquiAnalgesia, EquiSteroidia, OB Tracker -
    - Missing webOS phones when I use my iPhone5 and iPad Mini. At least I have my TouchPad to web surf still! -
  11. BBooDad's Avatar
    Posts
    406 Posts
    Global Posts
    541 Global Posts
    #31  
    Until they let TouchPad crew go after 1st Q 2012, as reported elsewhere. an OS w/o current hardware is dead.


    - Sent from my HP webOS TouchPad using Communities -


    I think HP is keeping software so they don't get sued by phone companies. Hope I'm wrong!

    - Sent from my HP webOS TouchPad using Communities -
    -
    - my webOS apps: Bishop Scores, EquiAnalgesia, EquiSteroidia, OB Tracker -
    - Missing webOS phones when I use my iPhone5 and iPad Mini. At least I have my TouchPad to web surf still! -
  12. #32  
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkeye_a View Post
    end users have never embraced Linux.
    Now, actually, I believe that while your statement is entirely true it is in no way accurate. It needs an additional word in there: "knowingly". Lots of people buy (for some reason I can't work out) Apple machines running OSX, ditto with Android. Both of these are *nix, the end users just don't care, so long as it does what it says on the box.

    Yes, 'dev' type users (who are probably the main people on fora such as this) know webOS is linux under the hood, but like OSX and Android we too have a snappy (sortof!) name to hide that from users.

    I really like webOS as a platform and would love to contribute some time to making it spread wider.
    Last edited by AlisonW; 12/11/2011 at 11:15 AM. Reason: sp.
    @AlisonW | @TouchMarkIt | Highgate, London & Markyate, England
    Palm Pilot -> Handspring Visor -> Palm Pre- + TouchPad + Pre3
  13. jeffmcc's Avatar
    Posts
    619 Posts
    Global Posts
    621 Global Posts
    #33  
    Quote Originally Posted by milominderbinder View Post
    webOS is closed source. Rod and others have explained that they cannot port copy protected software without a license.

    Android on the other hand is open source so those apps could be ported to the webOS hardware.
    Not anymore

    NOT "HP webOS"!!!
  14. #34  
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffmcc View Post
    Not anymore
    Well, all that has happened so far is an announcement of an intent to open source webOS at some time in the future.

    No new open source code is available today compared to before the announcement, and no timeframe for releasing any new code has been given.

    So right now, everything that is not already on opensource.palm.com remains under the closed source licenses and is not legally redistributable.

    I would expect it will be three months or more before we see anything other than Enyo released as open source.

    -- Rod
    WebOS Internals and Preware Founder and Developer
    You may wish to donate by Paypal to donations @ webos-internals.org if you find our work useful.
    All donations go back into development.
    www.webos-internals.org twitter.com/webosinternals facebook.com/webosinternals
    jeffmcc likes this.
  15. #35  
    I was reading the first few posts of this thread and I was like, "why are they saying webOS is not open-source?" Then I checked out the date haha
    The Original Owner of the AT&T Pre3
    jeffmcc likes this.
  16. jeffmcc's Avatar
    Posts
    619 Posts
    Global Posts
    621 Global Posts
    #36  
    Quote Originally Posted by rwhitby View Post
    Well, all that has happened so far is an announcement of an intent to open source webOS at some time in the future.

    No new open source code is available today compared to before the announcement, and no timeframe for releasing any new code has been given.

    So right now, everything that is not already on opensource.palm.com remains under the closed source licenses and is not legally redistributable.

    I would expect it will be three months or more before we see anything other than Enyo released as open source.

    -- Rod
    True true....but still we can't technically say "webOS is closed source" when we are on the brink of a new frontier of webOS based open sourced mobile operating systems

    NOT "HP webOS"!!!
  17. #37  
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeffmcc View Post
    True true....but still we can't technically say "webOS is closed source" when we are on the brink of a new frontier of webOS based open sourced mobile operating systems
    But we also don't know what they will have to remove before open sourcing either. With a closed source os they can distribute other people's code that they have licensed. When they open source it they can't just make all that source available.

    Also, so many people are saying that webOS won't face legal battles like android. It certainly may when that source is made available AND if it enjoys a modicum of success. Up to now webOS has been very small potatoes - no one (apple or ms) had no interest as it was not even close to being considered a competitor. If it takes of it would be, and that is when lawyers would start paying attention.
  18. #38  
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikey47 View Post
    But we also don't know what they will have to remove before open sourcing either. With a closed source os they can distribute other people's code that they have licensed. When they open source it they can't just make all that source available.

    Also, so many people are saying that webOS won't face legal battles like android. It certainly may when that source is made available AND if it enjoys a modicum of success. Up to now webOS has been very small potatoes - no one (apple or ms) had no interest as it was not even close to being considered a competitor. If it takes of it would be, and that is when lawyers would start paying attention.
    HP has critical patents on how to manage calls on an smartphone device, system bar management, launcher grid , and the smartphone itself. If HP backs up webOS OEMs with their patent portfolio, you can bet Android/iOS have more to loose than to win.
    Last edited by deCorvett; 12/12/2011 at 08:27 AM.
    Soorma likes this.
  19. #39  
    Newness Developments apps:

  20. #40  
    I'm sure there will be half dozen dev groups popping up over the next year but I look at it like the Android landscape... Many hacks are out there but there are the "quality" ones that are generally accepted by tech enthusiasts (Cyanogenmod, Team Overcome...). Assuming all the necessary code will be published over time, I'm not so worried... I trust the development will be in the good hands of webOS Internals.
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions