05/11/2010, 01:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
Dear Palm and MotionApps:
In Classic, you have set up a maintenance nightmare. MotionApps has to depend on Palm's webOS release cycle just to fix bugs introduced by releases of webOS. This extends the cycle time for fixing bugs by months. In the mean time, users suffer. Please get together and set up a better way for MotionApps to distribute updates to their application. How bad would it be to send out a webOS release where the entire change log consisted of updates for MotionApps? |
05/11/2010, 01:59 PM
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 73
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
I find it amazing that Palm hasn't joined themselves at the hip to ensure that Classic is as compatible as possible. When you throw Classic apps into the app count, it's got to be a phenomenal increase in number of apps that run on the Pre/Pixi.
|
05/11/2010, 02:17 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
I fully understand the technical situation. My request is for PALM to find a way to send out OS updates for Classic. Even if the entire purpose of the update is just for Classic. The interval between acknowledging a bug and fixing it is just too long.
|
05/11/2010, 02:20 PM
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
Another thing to consider is that maybe at the time Classic was conceived and implemented, the only way for it to work would have been via special low-level access. Maybe since webOS has matured a little (i.e. PDK), maybe it is possible to re-architect Classic so that is separated from the core OS.
|
05/11/2010, 04:49 PM
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 453
Likes Received: 1
Thanks: 156
Thanked 77 Times in 49 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
05/11/2010, 06:55 PM
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
I would love to see better integration, like being able to use the general webOS clipblard. But if I had to choose between the two, I'd first prefer they correct the bug/fix cycle problem.
Last edited by RJKinsman; 05/12/2010 at 04:54 AM. |
05/11/2010, 07:14 PM
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 958
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 121
Thanked 44 Times in 39 Posts
|
I doubt that Palm would ever release an OS update just for Classic. It would require the carriers to approve, plus everyone would have to download it, whether or not they were running Classic. It would be much better to separate Classic from the OS, as RJKinsman has mentioned.
|
05/11/2010, 08:10 PM
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Woo, MA
Posts: 1,438
Likes Received: 3
Thanks: 287
Thanked 464 Times in 250 Posts
|
Quote:
add the ability to buy classic apps from the app store, and you could se a huge number of the 20,000 estemated palmOS apps in the catalog quickly. Sure it would probably be a fraction of the total apps. But that fraction is likely to consist of developers whos apps were popular and in demand already. Things like datebk, isilo, ect. A large influx of tried and true productivity apps is something webOS could use. They don't have to be pretty, just functional. The biggest hurdle would be adding some "double tap to zoom" or other ability to make non stylus input more fluid. |
|
05/11/2010, 09:14 PM
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
Please don't change the subject. If you want to post about something else, start a new thread.
The subject of this thread is an appeal to Motionapps and Palm getting together to correct the horrendously long bug/fix cycle. |
05/12/2010, 09:02 AM
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
Codon 66, ChasT, I appreciate you're responses to babydaddy75, but he's really changing the subject. I would like to keep this thread on the orignal subject, an appeal to MotionApps and Palm to get together and come up with a better process for getting more timely fixes to problems in Classic.
We've heard from MotionApps, thanks! Palm -- where are you on this? Can you please post a response? Thanks! |
05/12/2010, 01:08 PM
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,524
Likes Received: 2
Thanks: 54
Thanked 66 Times in 51 Posts
|
Quote:
I'd love to see Classic work better/quicker as standalone, or manage to be integrated into webOS so that PalmOS apps could be used direct from the webOS screens. And it's great that MA are on-board too.
__________________
Thought of the day : No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway |
|
05/12/2010, 01:47 PM
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
Quote:
Palm? Where are you? What is your position? Could you please weigh in on this? Even if your response is no more than something like, "yes, we know it's a problem, but we can't fix it right now, and we appreciate your patience," that would be better than deafening silence! Thanks!!!!! |
|
05/12/2010, 01:49 PM
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 389
Likes Received: 0
Thanks: 15
Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
|
BTW, I'm doing the best I can to keep this thread on topic. If you want to create a thread about enhancements you would like to see in Classic, or who still uses Classic, or anything else, by all means, be my guest (Precentral's)!
But this thread is about the bug/fix cycle described in my original post. Thanks! |
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|



