Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1.    #1  
    Hey, haven't we heard this before: "Sorry, but we did NOT do this on purpose, we are just too stupid to get things right... Come on, you know we are not good at maths, how can you expect us to add up the cases?"

    Last time it was Saddam's WMD, now it is the "decline" of worldwide terrorism thanks to Bush... http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/13/pow....ap/index.html
  2. #2  
    Quote Originally Posted by clulup
    Hey, haven't we heard this before: "Sorry, but we did NOT do this on purpose, we are just too stupid to get things right... Come on, you know we are not good at maths, how can you expect us to add up the cases?"

    Last time it was Saddam's WMD, now it is the "decline" of worldwide terrorism thanks to Bush... http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/06/13/pow....ap/index.html
    The only thing sorrier in believing the don't know exactly what there doing is; thinking CNN is an unbiased sorce of information.
  3.    #3  
    Quote Originally Posted by dlbrummels
    The only thing sorrier in believing the don't know exactly what there doing is; thinking CNN is an unbiased sorce of information.
    Sorry, but I don't see what you mean.
  4. #4  
    The powers at be are blaming it on mistakes, instead of the truth.

    Must be the "Simpson" 'Doh' excuse !
  5. #5  
    clulup, thanks for the post. I am sure you are going get some: "The Media Is Biased, Unreliable, and otherwise Stupid" comments (i.e. the one above, I think...), but may the force of truth be with you!

Posting Permissions