Page 7 of 18 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111217 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 345
  1. #121  
    lol


    Quote Originally Posted by Kenanator View Post
    I don't think Micael would have been happy unless Obama himself was out there, 2 minutes after the fire even started, with a roll of Bounty Paper Towels and a bottle of Dawn...
  2. #122  
    Quote Originally Posted by cjgem View Post
    You can't have both way's. were they in on one or not? The WH reports you linked to mentioned NO trickery or slight of hand. After oil was discovered 2 leaks were found with a third 4 days later. Oh and I especially like the part where you said the CG doesn't have underwater oil specialists, come on man, I guess by your logic you'd need a plumber to tell you an over head water pipe was leaking on your head.

    And your point? The company and the Coast Guard noted no leak at first. Was somebody supposed to not believe them? Really, tell us what you would have done differently. Please, by all means, enlighten us.
  3. #123  
    Quote Originally Posted by davidra View Post
    And your point? The company and the Coast Guard noted no leak at first. Was somebody supposed to not believe them? Really, tell us what you would have done differently. Please, by all means, enlighten us.

    This isn't about me, It's about your post saying one thing and then posting a link pages later that made you first post look silly. priceless!
  4. #124  
    The day we will realize it's not about black or white red or blue but human-being it will be too late, the end!!!
  5. #125  
    Quote Originally Posted by cjgem View Post
    This isn't about me, It's about your post saying one thing and then posting a link pages later that made you first post look silly. priceless!
    Now THAT'S funny.

    But of course, I should have expected that the only person to support Micael in this trip down a road to nowhere would be you. Perfect.
  6. #126  
    OMG all this arguing is so stupid. Arguing isn't going to get anything done. Some of you act like a bunch of kids.

    If any of you watch the TV show called "The Boondocks" I recommend you watch the first episode of the new season aired may 2 on Adultswim. I highly recommend it. One of the smartest shows I have ever watched.
  7. #127  
    what exactly is this supposed to be criticizing Obama for? *** should he have done different? and why is this comparable to Katrina? are "refugees" being shot at by police as looters? Are babies being swept away from their families? Are people dying from starvation and dehydration?

    i can't believe people are blaming the oil spill on Obama, and claiming he "doesn't care". Really what are you basing that on? I understand not liking Obama's politics, but at this point people are just being critical for the sake of it...

    and lying about "being on top of it"?!?! never give a politician a phrase like "on top of it" republican, democrat, independent. "on top of it" can mean anything from the issue is being considered to the problem is being solved as we speak. Honestly do you think the white house looked at the oil spill and started playing a game of cards? get real
    Last edited by Mhunterjr; 05/06/2010 at 07:10 PM.
  8. #128  
    Quote Originally Posted by davidra View Post
    Now THAT'S funny.

    But of course, I should have expected that the only person to support Micael in this trip down a road to nowhere would be you. Perfect.
    deflection, nice try but perhaps it would be wise to remember what you posted before posting something else that contradicts. Again this is all about you and your mastery of deflection
  9. #129  
    Quote Originally Posted by cjgem View Post
    deflection, nice try but perhaps it would be wise to remember what you posted before posting something else that contradicts. Again this is all about you and your mastery of deflection
    Actually, no, it's not. This thread isn't at all about your obsession to try and find something I said and then rephrased, no matter how much you seem to want it to be. Try posting a comment on the topic of the thread and not about me and maybe I'll consider responding.
  10. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
       #130  
    Quote Originally Posted by davidra View Post
    And your point? The company and the Coast Guard noted no leak at first. Was somebody supposed to not believe them? Really, tell us what you would have done differently. Please, by all means, enlighten us.
    I thought they were all there 100% on day 1. If there was no detected leaks, why would they be?
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  11. #131  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    I thought they were all there 100% on day 1. If there was no detected leaks, why would they be?
    I suppose because they were very prescient, and concerned about the fact that there might be a leak. Did you read the White House link? Does it still sound to you like they weren't cognizant of the risks? And you still haven't responded to the very simple question: what would you have done differently?
  12. #132  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    I thought they were all there 100% on day 1. If there was no detected leaks, why would they be?
    100 percent of the information available on day one is now about 10 percent of the total information on day 5 gimme a break
    I think your grasping a straws here... no, i know you are.
    Life is short, Play hard, and enjoy every moment as if it was your last.
  13. #133  
    Quote Originally Posted by davidra View Post
    Actually, no, it's not. This thread isn't at all about your obsession to try and find something I said and then rephrased, no matter how much you seem to want it to be. Try posting a comment on the topic of the thread and not about me and maybe I'll consider responding.

    Why? You seem to be quite sufficient at debating against your self.
  14. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
       #134  
    Quote Originally Posted by xForsaken View Post
    100 percent of the information available on day one is now about 10 percent of the total information on day 5 gimme a break
    I think your grasping a straws here... no, i know you are.
    Excuse me. What part of "Though his agency was charged with coordinating the federal response to the major oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Department of the Interior chief of staff Tom Strickland was in the Grand Canyon with his wife last week participating in activities that included white-water rafting, ABC News has learned." are you not getting?

    I guess you guy's definition of being "on it" is different than mine. I suppose he was texting in to his crackberry while he was shooting the rapids with his wife, coordinating away between torrents of water that were washing over the raft, a full 3 days after the leak was discovered. His coordination skills must be legendary.
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  15. #135  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    Excuse me. What part of "Though his agency was charged with coordinating the federal response to the major oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Department of the Interior chief of staff Tom Strickland was in the Grand Canyon with his wife last week participating in activities that included white-water rafting, ABC News has learned." are you not getting?

    I guess you guy's definition of being "on it" is different than mine. I suppose he was texting in to his crackberry while he was shooting the rapids with his wife, coordinating away between torrents of water that were washing over the raft, a full 3 days after the leak was discovered. His coordination skills must be legendary.
    And I guess you still haven't answered the simple questions:
    What difference would it have made if this one person, who is a STAFF person, was there? And secondly, what would you have done differently? Do we have to keep asking in every post until you come up with an answer?
  16. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
       #136  
    Quote Originally Posted by davidra View Post
    And I guess you still haven't answered the simple questions:
    What difference would it have made if this one person, who is a STAFF person, was there? And secondly, what would you have done differently? Do we have to keep asking in every post until you come up with an answer?
    Not exactly, he was the CHIEF of staff. Hardly just a "staff" person. Please. That's like saying Rahm is just a staff person.....

    And as for what would I do differently? I'd be honest in my self critique and admit it when I failed to respond. I'd then analyze and plan how I could improve my performance and explain to the American people that plan.
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  17. #137  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    Excuse me. What part of "Though his agency was charged with coordinating the federal response to the major oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, Department of the Interior chief of staff Tom Strickland was in the Grand Canyon with his wife last week participating in activities that included white-water rafting, ABC News has learned." are you not getting?

    I guess you guy's definition of being "on it" is different than mine. I suppose he was texting in to his crackberry while he was shooting the rapids with his wife, coordinating away between torrents of water that were washing over the raft, a full 3 days after the leak was discovered. His coordination skills must be legendary.
    His agency functioned just fine without him being there so l fail to see your point here. It's not a one man operation. And since his absence made no difference to the outcome he has nothing to explain to the American people imo. BP has some explaining to do.
    Sony Clie --> Tungsten t2 --> iPhone3g --> Palm Pre --> Droid
  18. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
       #138  
    Quote Originally Posted by darreno1 View Post
    His agency functioned just fine without him being there so l fail to see your point here. It's not a one man operation. And since his absence made no difference to the outcome he has nothing to explain to the American people imo. BP has some explaining to do.
    Lol. He's the head of the agency for crying out loud!? Are you kidding me? If this was a republican administration you guys would be having conniption fits!
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  19. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
       #139  
    Quote Originally Posted by darreno1 View Post
    His agency functioned just fine without him being there so l fail to see your point here. It's not a one man operation. And since his absence made no difference to the outcome he has nothing to explain to the American people imo. BP has some explaining to do.
    This post is absolutely amazing. Darreno, this agency is in charge for coordination for the fed's response. You're telling me there were no coordination decisions needed that would require the head of the agency?
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  20. #140  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    This post is absolutely amazing. Darreno, this agency is in charge for coordination for the fed's response. You're telling me there were no coordination decisions needed that would require the head of the agency?
    Ever heard of a cell phone? Computer? Email? If they needed his input I'm sure he was reachable.
    Sony Clie --> Tungsten t2 --> iPhone3g --> Palm Pre --> Droid
Page 7 of 18 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111217 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions