Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 261
  1. #61  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    So.... saying that you think that the President is a racist, makes you a racist? How does that work exactly?
    I could dig up any number of clips from hannity,rush,billo or even the catty Coulter where the argument is that because someone is our president they deserve the utmost respect and a little leeway when the potus makes a gaffe...

    so is obama not their president now? Shouldn't they be front and center saying President Obama should at least get the benifit of the doubt? Shouldnt they be condeming people who are bringing guns to presidential debates? I've heard them all say in one way or another that CODE PINK demonstrators should be locked up...

    whats the diff in the town halls? I dont remember them being so nice to Cindy Sheehan when she was protesting BOOSH...

    Calling someone a racist does not make them a racist....calling someone a racist when they are the PRESIDENT of your Country makes them Unamerica? That was a talking point awhile back.... I bet I can find a clip of Rush saying the same thing about people calling boosh a war criminal...
    Last edited by mrloserpunk; 08/25/2009 at 08:28 PM.
    "When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth"


    PM me your questions, If I cant find an answer, I'll show you who can.
  2. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
    #62  
    Quote Originally Posted by Toby View Post
    I certainly don't claim to speak for all, but 6 months ago, I don't think I'd ever heard of him. And I've really only seen a clip of him with on his show.
    I remember seeing that. Penn's a great guy.
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  3. Micael's Avatar
    Posts
    736 Posts
    Global Posts
    739 Global Posts
    #63  
    Quote Originally Posted by mrloserpunk View Post
    I could dig up any number of clips from hannity,rush,billo or even the catty Coulter where the argument is that because someone is our president they deserve the utmost respect and a little leeway when the potus makes a gaffe...

    so is obama not their president now? Shouldn't they be front and center saying President Obama should at least get the benifit of the doubt? Shouldnt they be condeming people who are bringing guns to presidential debates? I've heard them all say in one way or another that CODE PINK demonstrators should be locked up...

    whats the diff in the town halls? I dont remember them being so nice to Cindy Sheehan when she was protesting BOOSH...
    Calling someone a racist does not make them a racist....calling someone a racist when they are the PRESIDENT of your Country makes them Unamerica? That was a talking point awhile back.... I bet I can find a clip of Rush saying the same thing about people calling boosh a war criminal...
    So you judge me and others based on your perception of talking heads on the right. And you use their actions to justify your own.

    News flash! They don't speak for me, nor do I think like them. I may agree with some of the things they say, but many things I may disagree with.

    Forgetting that Glenn is a talking head for a minute, he's got a right to his opinion, and to voice it. Even if you can't stand it. That's me talking. Not Coulter or Rush. Cindy Sheehan had a right to say what she did, when she did, and where she did it.

    And yes, you people can act like fools and follow some other fool's lead and boycott and inflict pain on the guy for talking his mind, if you want. That's y'alls right. Ain't this country grand!
    The Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
  4. #64  
    Quote Originally Posted by Technologic 2 View Post
    Sprint has been pressured to pull their ads from The Glenn Beck Show because he said President Obama was being racist. This happened after President Obama said the Police Officer acted stupidly in arresting a Black Professor.

    Show your support for Glenn Beck.

    Ask Sprint when they will be renewing their ads on Glenn Beck. Remind them that Color of Change, which sent them form letters demanding a boycott of Glenn Beck, is a radical group that engages in racist hate-speech. Tell them CoC's founder went to prison for inciting the 1992 L.A. Riots, and accused President Bush of giving troops orders to shoot blacks people after Hurricane Katrina. Tell them that you are a loyal Beck listener and they should not be taking sides in this political game.
    Who is Glen Beck?

    Obama was an ***** for stepping into a local issue!!!!

    Glen Beck was an ***** for even bringing race into the picture. Really!!! This is insane. Obama was an *****, not racist...

    Glen Beck is stupid and should get canceled for being such. Then again, heck, we should forgive everyone. Right?

    Glen Beck should wear a gun on his show and state how he is against abortion... and hate gays... and believes a person should only be married to one person. Wait... rofl....

    On the real, Glen Beck has poked a stick at obama for a while... this time he went a bit far.... Oh, well. Can't believe people are surprised by this?
    Last edited by theog; 08/25/2009 at 09:08 PM.
    01000010 01100001 01101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01000011 01110010 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100001
  5. groovy's Avatar
    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    955 Global Posts
    #65  
    Partisan democrats want to suppress the voices of the President's critics? No surprises there. A major corporation caves in when being accused of the "R" word? No surprises there either.

    The only thing I find remotely surprising is that anyone would think electing an African-American President would do anything to help the supposed "racial divide" in this country. It won't because there are too many people with too much invested in keeping it going.
  6. #66  
    Quote Originally Posted by groovy View Post
    Partisan democrats want to suppress the voices of the President's critics? No surprises there. A major corporation caves in when being accused of the "R" word? No surprises there either.

    The only thing I find remotely surprising is that anyone would think electing an African-American President would do anything to help the supposed "racial divide" in this country. It won't because there are too many people with too much invested in keeping it going.
    Glen Beck is dump... give me a break. Actually, it would be smart of Dems to let him talk as much as possible!!! Like they do the guy who has his own radio show... the guy who uses prescription drugs... the pill guy... can't think of his name... all I know is I get a Rush every time I hear his voice.

    Anyway, electing Obama does help the racial divide... the problem is thinking it will help in 6 to 12 months!!!!
    01000010 01100001 01101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01000011 01110010 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100001
  7. groovy's Avatar
    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    955 Global Posts
    #67  
    Quote Originally Posted by theog View Post
    Obama was an ***** for stepping into a local issue!!!!


    Glen Beck is stupid and should get canceled for being such.
    Let me show you what television would look like if they canceled shows for stupidity.

  8. groovy's Avatar
    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    955 Global Posts
    #68  
    Quote Originally Posted by theog View Post
    Glen Beck is dump... give me a break. Actually, it would be smart of Dems to let him talk as much as possible!!! Like they do the guy who has his own radio show... the guy who uses prescription drugs... the pill guy... can't think of his name... all I know is I get a Rush every time I hear his voice.

    Anyway, electing Obama does help the racial divide... the problem is thinking it will help in six to twelve months!!!!
    Let him???
  9. #69  
    Quote Originally Posted by groovy View Post
    Let him???
    Yea, like the opposite of stopping him.. maybe I typed a bit fast... I should have been more accurate... lol...

    Want me to re-write it... I would, but I think you know what I was saying... its a forum... lol
    01000010 01100001 01101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01000011 01110010 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100001
  10. #70  
    Quote Originally Posted by groovy View Post



    Let me show you what television would look like if they canceled shows for stupidity.

    I know... I was watching PBS and noticed how that stupid lioness went left... if she had went right, the meal would have been hers!!! Dumb...

    We should cancel PBS... stupid station.
    01000010 01100001 01101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01000011 01110010 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100001
  11. #71  
    I think it's ironic that the OP's canned message was, in itself, misinformation. It stated that "CoC's founder went to prison for inciting the 1992 L.A. Riots". The reality is that he was involved in a protest march, and (with many others) was arrested. The charges were later dropped, and those arrested were given a settlement from the city.

    So I guess the takeaway message is that if a bunch of white guys scream at town meetings, it's an expression of their first amendment (and 2nd amendment if they're carrying AK-47's), but if black guys march in protest it's "inciting a riot".
    Last edited by Bujin; 08/25/2009 at 09:28 PM.
    Everything's Amazing and Nobody's Happy

    Treo600 --> Treo650-->PPC6700-->Treo700P-->Treo755P-->Treo800W --> Touch Pro-->Palm Pre --> EVO 4G
  12. groovy's Avatar
    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    955 Global Posts
    #72  
    Quote Originally Posted by theog View Post
    Yea, like the opposite of stopping him.. maybe I typed a bit fast... I should have been more accurate... lol...

    Want me to re-write it... I would, but I think you know what I was saying... its a forum... lol
    I got it but it seems a little draconian that the Democratic party is in the position of deciding who can express his/her opinion on television.
  13. #73  
    Yawn
    Bob Meyer
    I'm out of my mind. But feel free to leave a message.
  14. #74  
    Quote Originally Posted by groovy View Post
    I got it but it seems a little draconian that the Democratic party is in the position of deciding who can express his/her opinion on television.
    I understand your point... good one... no argument from me on that...

    Freedom of speech.

    My thought is do the Republicans really want this guy talking??? Sometimes such far out stuff does not help the "cause" in which you are fighting. Who really wants to suppress this guy?

    Guess I say that because a good friend of mine is a hard Republican... he hates a lot of stuff going around now. I happen to think he is right... the Bush Game is so 90's.

    Hi!!! Did you know he has a black child??? Born out of wedlock??? Wow. Vote for me!!!!
    01000010 01100001 01101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01100100 00100000 01000011 01110010 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100001
  15. #75  
    Quote Originally Posted by groovy View Post
    I got it but it seems a little draconian that the Democratic party is in the position of deciding who can express his/her opinion on television.
    Seriously? Your gonna say that over a boycott?
    Federal judge rules warrantless wiretaps illegal - Wikinews, the free news source

    What say you about that?
    "When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth"


    PM me your questions, If I cant find an answer, I'll show you who can.
  16. groovy's Avatar
    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    955 Global Posts
    #76  
    Quote Originally Posted by Bujin View Post
    I think it's ironic that the OP's canned message was, in itself, misinformation. It stated that "CoC's founder went to prison for inciting the 1992 L.A. Riots". The reality is that he was involved in a protest march, and (with many others) was arrested.
    You're right. Beck says so here:

    http://www.foxnews.com/search-result...-van-jones.htm
  17. groovy's Avatar
    Posts
    941 Posts
    Global Posts
    955 Global Posts
    #77  
    Quote Originally Posted by mrloserpunk View Post
    Seriously? Your gonna say that over a boycott?
    Federal judge rules warrantless wiretaps illegal - Wikinews, the free news source

    What say you about that?
    I can't disagree with both?
  18. #78  
    Quote Originally Posted by Micael View Post
    So you judge me and others based on your perception of talking heads on the right. And you use their actions to justify your own.

    News flash! They don't speak for me, nor do I think like them. I may agree with some of the things they say, but many things I may disagree with.

    Forgetting that Glenn is a talking head for a minute, he's got a right to his opinion, and to voice it. Even if you can't stand it. That's me talking. Not Coulter or Rush. Cindy Sheehan had a right to say what she did, when she did, and where she did it.

    And yes, you people can act like fools and follow some other fool's lead and boycott and inflict pain on the guy for talking his mind, if you want. That's y'alls right. Ain't this country grand!
    A bit sensitive are we? You should invent a game where you write conclusions on a big game board and then jump on them...get it jump to conclusions?

    I didnt judge you. I judged the talking heads and pundits that you are saying deserve protection from consumer boycotts under freedom of speech. I disagree wholeheartedly, and if the Faux crew can suggest boycotting an entire country because it's leaders wont back booshes invasion, I think they can eat some of their own medicine when one of them calls the president a racist.
    "When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth"


    PM me your questions, If I cant find an answer, I'll show you who can.
  19. #79  
    Quote Originally Posted by groovy View Post
    I can't disagree with both?
    Nope. Unfourtunatly in our 2 party system your either with us or against us
    I'm joking. You certainly can. Sorry for being so jumpy and the double post... However, show me where the democratic party is making this decision...I'd argue that the dems have not started playing silly season with the FCC reguarding Television rules......yet

    BOOSH sure did though:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Martin_(FCC)

    I honestly was disappointed with the republican party during the previous administrations 8 years...so much so, that although I felt Mccain was a better choice, the potus is just 1 part of the system... I just couldn't give them the power to screw up so much for another 4 years. A pity Bush beat mccain in that primary way back when....
    Last edited by mrloserpunk; 08/25/2009 at 10:21 PM.
    "When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth"


    PM me your questions, If I cant find an answer, I'll show you who can.
  20. Jaer57's Avatar
    Posts
    160 Posts
    Global Posts
    165 Global Posts
    #80  
    Quote Originally Posted by mrloserpunk View Post
    Seriously? Your gonna say that over a boycott?
    Federal judge rules warrantless wiretaps illegal - Wikinews, the free news source

    What say you about that?
    I'm sure Beck's audience contains a large amount of conservative/libertarian viewers who aren't fans of government intervention regardless of who it originates from (Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc.). Beck spends a lot of time covering those who practice or promote a Marxist philosophy, which is the antithesis of a libertarian or classical liberal philosophy...
    Current device: Palm Pre
    Former devices: Treo 755p, Treo 650
Page 4 of 14 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions