webOS Nation Forums >  webOS Discussion >  LG webOS TV > LG make webOS TV affordable
LG make webOS TV affordable
  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02/07/2014, 11:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
akitayo's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,116
After reading the post below I just sent a tweet to @LGElectronics @LGSVL and @WebOsDev with the link of that article and the hashtags #makeit #affordable

What do you think of the article content? Thanks.

Smart TV Still the Wild West?


The first Smart TVs shipped more than 3 years ago, and have been an area of intense focus by many of the TV industry leaders, highlighting CES booths alongside other developments such as 3D and 4K. But with all the time that has passed, there has not been a significant amount of consolidation around successful platforms, such as has happened in the mobile segments. Why not? Why do Smart TV companies insist so often on blazing their own path to the exclusion of industry progression and potentially better consumer adoption? This isnít much changed from the early Wild West days of the Smart TV category.

I think the answer is simple: brands still believe there is significant money to be made by attracting consumers to their protected platform.

However, there is little evidence of manufacturers finding success in such efforts, and the development effort and cost to continue with your own platform do not seem to pay off. At the same time, potential open-source efforts like Google TV and the Smart TV Alliance seem to have fizzled while Samsung and LGE announced complete new software environments for their Smart TVs at CES. DisplaySearchís own consumer research suggests that people just want to use a lean-back device like the TV for a select few low-involvement activities, so complexity and proprietary applications seem unnecessary. With streaming one of the first significant sources of 4K content becoming a reality this year, perhaps there is a new opportunity to reignite interest in Smart TVs.

The success of other streaming devices connected to the TV also brings into question the value of integrating the function within the TV. Itís fairly easy for a consumer to take a 2 year old HD flat panel TV, and make it a Smart TV with the addition of a streaming set-top-box, Blu-Ray player or gaming console. Often, the cost of these solutions is less than the premium for a Smart TV over a basic set. Admittedly, itís not an elegant wire-free solution, but over 90% of US TV households have put up with a pay-TV box for decades without significant complaint. Globally, the connected TV share of shipments has only improved from 30% in 2012 to 34% in 2013 according to the latest DisplaySearch Quarterly Advanced TV Design and Features Report, mostly as emerging markets fail to take up the technology. Developed Smart TV markets such as Japan and Europe have plateaued in recent quarters, but the US has seen stronger gains recently as the premium has dropped to more mainstream price points.

What does the future hold for Smart TV Ė more fragmentation or the development of true ecosystems? This and other topics will be explored at the upcoming US FPD Connected Devices conference with companies like Roku, TiVo, Samsung and SambaTV.

Smart TV Still the Wild West? | DisplaySearch Blog
akitayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked By: Rnp
Old 02/18/2014, 01:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
shneor's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by akitayo View Post
After reading the post below I just sent a tweet to @LGElectronics @LGSVL and @WebOsDev with the link of that article and the hashtags #makeit #affordable

What do you think of the article content? Thanks.

Smart TV Still the Wild West?


The first Smart TVs shipped more than 3 years ago, and have been an area of intense focus by many of the TV industry leaders, highlighting CES booths alongside other developments such as 3D and 4K. But with all the time that has passed, there has not been a significant amount of consolidation around successful platforms, such as has happened in the mobile segments. Why not? Why do Smart TV companies insist so often on blazing their own path to the exclusion of industry progression and potentially better consumer adoption? This isnít much changed from the early Wild West days of the Smart TV category.

I think the answer is simple: brands still believe there is significant money to be made by attracting consumers to their protected platform.

However, there is little evidence of manufacturers finding success in such efforts, and the development effort and cost to continue with your own platform do not seem to pay off. At the same time, potential open-source efforts like Google TV and the Smart TV Alliance seem to have fizzled while Samsung and LGE announced complete new software environments for their Smart TVs at CES. DisplaySearchís own consumer research suggests that people just want to use a lean-back device like the TV for a select few low-involvement activities, so complexity and proprietary applications seem unnecessary. With streaming one of the first significant sources of 4K content becoming a reality this year, perhaps there is a new opportunity to reignite interest in Smart TVs.

The success of other streaming devices connected to the TV also brings into question the value of integrating the function within the TV. Itís fairly easy for a consumer to take a 2 year old HD flat panel TV, and make it a Smart TV with the addition of a streaming set-top-box, Blu-Ray player or gaming console. Often, the cost of these solutions is less than the premium for a Smart TV over a basic set. Admittedly, itís not an elegant wire-free solution, but over 90% of US TV households have put up with a pay-TV box for decades without significant complaint. Globally, the connected TV share of shipments has only improved from 30% in 2012 to 34% in 2013 according to the latest DisplaySearch Quarterly Advanced TV Design and Features Report, mostly as emerging markets fail to take up the technology. Developed Smart TV markets such as Japan and Europe have plateaued in recent quarters, but the US has seen stronger gains recently as the premium has dropped to more mainstream price points.

What does the future hold for Smart TV Ė more fragmentation or the development of true ecosystems? This and other topics will be explored at the upcoming US FPD Connected Devices conference with companies like Roku, TiVo, Samsung and SambaTV.

Smart TV Still the Wild West? | DisplaySearch Blog
DON't hold your breath. Ihave a 55 inch LG smart tv. NO html5, and Flash, according to theit tech support is hsrd wired and cannot be updated. Its useless. The bean counters are in charge. WEbod will make a good embedded platform for them.
__________________
Shneor
Pre 3 on T-Mobile, 32gb Touchpad
shneor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02/19/2014, 10:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
akitayo's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by shneor View Post
DON't hold your breath. Ihave a 55 inch LG smart tv. NO html5, and Flash, according to theit tech support is hsrd wired and cannot be updated. Its useless. The bean counters are in charge. WEbod will make a good embedded platform for them.
Only expecting when these new LG version Smart TVs with webOS in ,come out.
akitayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What WebOS TV features could make their way to OpenWebOS and WebOS hardware? Sheikboy LG webOS TV 4 01/14/2014 04:20 AM
Wow. Meg said HP will make probably make new WebOS tablets millertime HP TouchPad 55 08/21/2012 11:32 PM
Want to join the Developing WebOS team, yet make apps for WebOS 1.4.5 ? PalmPixi_User23 Palm Pixi and Pixi Plus 0 06/25/2011 11:10 PM
Affordable Treo 90's adrian76 Palm OS Devices & Apps 22 09/27/2002 11:10 AM


 


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0