Page 72 of 74 FirstFirst ... 22 626768697071727374 LastLast
Results 1,421 to 1,440 of 1474
Like Tree144Likes
  1. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1421  
    Quote Originally Posted by michel_ng View Post
    @Herrie

    could you please explain that proximity.patch exactly do and which problems it should solve?
    Hello Michel, it is a testing patch : it disables screen auto off trigerred by proximity sensor, while using the phone app as it seems to be the root cause of in call reset. Testing it on my veer, I noticed that I had no longer in call resets, so it seems to solve the reset issue, but maybe we can investigate a bit more to try and understand why the proximity sensor use, or the screen off at the beginning of the call, causes resets.
  2. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1422  
    Having successufully tested Herrie's patch, I think the problem comes from something subsequent to screen off trigerred by the proximity sensor conflicting maybe with something the phone app is doing at the very beginning of the call. So I have another patch to propose : it simply disables the label visible while making calls displaying "Connecting" then the duration of the call. Surprisingly, having installed that patch on my 2.2.4 Veer, I haven't had a single reboot so far. Just had one reboot testing another contact !

    I attach it to my post if someone wants to test it. If you installed Herrie's patch, uninstall it, as it is another attempt to solve the same issue, and as the first patch seems to solve it too (but disables proximity sensor), if we want to make sure it is linked to the label, my patch must be used without the other one.

    I removed the attachment as this patch does not help.
    I've another idea, I'll test today and post the patch if it seems to work for me.

    Thanks !
    Last edited by TheOneill; 11/18/2012 at 02:26 AM.
  3. #1423  
    That will be awesome if you guys have solved this, I'll finally be able to update to 2.2.4
  4. #1424  
    If the patches don't work out, this guy replaced the 2.2.4 phone app with the 2.1.2 phone app. Anyone known if it worked out for him?
    Veer WebOS 2.2.4 Bluetooth Problems

    Ben
  5. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1425  
    I tried what you suggested Ben (replacing 2.2.4 phone app by the one is 2.1.2), no reboot so far, need some testing but it seems to be a good option.

    Thanks !
  6. #1426  
    Quote Originally Posted by TheOneill View Post
    I tried what you suggested Ben (replacing 2.2.4 phone app by the one is 2.1.2), no reboot so far, need some testing but it seems to be a good option.

    Thanks !
    The issue's I would be worried about, Skype, Phone Diag's, Other apps reliant on webOS 2.2.4 version...

    One could also use the Veer webOS 2.2.3 Phone app if that works better?

    As my Veer is not used as a phone, I do not have these issues, but I also have the Phone App from Pre2 (super Veer script)...
  7. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1427  
    This time I tried to patch CallSynergizer.jsjsjs $to$ $start$ $a$ &$quot$;$fake$&$quot$; $activity$ $during$ $call$ $that$ $should$ $prevent$ $activitymanager$ $to$ $go$ $idle$. $I$'$m$ $not$ $sure$ $that$ $the$ $reset$ $problem$ $is$ $due$ $to$ $system$ $going$ $idle$, $but$ $taking$ $a$ $look$ $closer$ $at$ $Herrie$'$s$ $log$, $and$ $my$ $log$, $comparing$ $it$ $to$ $a$ $successful$ $call$ $log$, $I$ $see$ $something$ $strange$ $with$ $the$ $system$ $going$ $idle$ $very$ $early$ $during$ $the$ $call$ $when$ $a$ $reset$ $occurs$. $This$ $seems$ $to$ $be$ $consistent$ $with$ $the$ $fact$ $that$ $once$ $the$ $proximity$ $sensor$ $is$ $disabled$, $keeping$ $the$ $screen$ $ON$ $allows$ $to$ $avoid$ $the$ $reset$.

    You can have a try with attached file, install the patch as usual with webosquickinstall, you can take a look inside to see what it does, it's very simple.

    With the patch, had no reboot today, let's see how it goes tomorrow.

    Pre-requisite for patch installation : veer with webos 2.2.4 with original (unpatched) phone app version.
    Attached Files Attached Files
  8. #1428  
    Well, i just found out, that favorite contacts result rebooting of veer on calling. So just try to remove all contacts from favorite list
  9. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1429  
    Unfortunately, I did not use any favorite contact but had reboot on outgoing calls. Resets are probably more likely to happen calling a favorite contact but I doubt it is the root cause.

    I've been running today with the activity patch, no reboot so far. I tried to call in different places, different contacts but one day in not enough to make sure iy is stable. anyone else tried that ?
  10. #1430  
    @TheOneill

    im trying it and will report ...
  11. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1431  
    Been testing for 6 days now, no reboot so far, it looks promising !
  12. #1432  
    Quote Originally Posted by TheOneill View Post
    Been testing for 6 days now, no reboot so far, it looks promising !
    Confirmed! No problems so far ...
  13. #1433  
    Hi guys, good to see that there might be a solution for our problem. Thanks in advance, TheOneill.
    I have myself not been able to test the patch as I getting this error when trying to install:

    Patch installation failed
    2 out of 6 hunks FAILED - - saving the rejects to........

    I'm using a Veer with the 2.2.4 superscript of John Steffes, so might that be the problem? Due to not being the the original phone app version of the Veer I mean. The phone app is unpatched as required.
    Any ideas?
  14. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1434  
    Hi,

    yes : that may be due to the superscript. The patch is very simple to do, there is only one file to modify, two lines to add. Could you get CallSynergizer.jsjsjs $via$ $webosquickinstall$ $and$ $send$ $it$ $to$ $me$ $so$ $that$ $I$ $patch$ $it$ ? $Otherwise$ $you$ $can$ $open$ $my$ $patch$ $in$ $np$++ $to$ $see$ $what$'$s$ $in$ $it$ $and$ $patch$ $it$ $manually$.

    CallSynergizer.jsjsjs $is$ $located$ $here$ : /$usr$/$palm$/$applications$/$com$.$palm$.$app$.$phone$/$source$/$CallSynergizer$.$js$

    Lionel
  15. #1435  
    Thanks for willing to do that. It may come in handy for other users of the superscript as well. Here is CallSynergizer.jsjsjs
    Attached Files Attached Files
  16. #1436  
    Quote Originally Posted by TheOneill View Post
    Pre-requisite for patch installation : veer with webos 2.2.4 with original (unpatched) phone app version.
    thanks, but conflict with "advanced system prefs - phone prefs": org.webosinternals.patches.advanced-system-prefs-phone-prefs

    patching file /usr/palm/applications/com.palm.app.phone/source/CallSynergizer.jsjsjs
    Hunk #1 succeeded at 50 (offset 1 line).
    Hunk #2 succeeded at 298 (offset 80 lines).
    Hunk #3 succeeded at 335 (offset 80 lines).
    Hunk #4 succeeded at 1064 (offset 138 lines).
    Hunk #5 succeeded at 1067 (offset 138 lines).
    Hunk #6 FAILED at 1447.
    1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file /usr/palm/applications/com.palm.app.phone/source/CallSynergizer.jsjsjs.$rej$

    can you make a patch that works after "advanced system prefs - phone prefs"? or even adjust the #6 hunk so it avoid the conflict to works both before and after the advanced patch
  17. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1437  
    @moo.tinys : yes I can try that. Could you send me your patched file CallSynergizer.jsjsjs ?
  18. TheOneill's Avatar
    Posts
    85 Posts
    Global Posts
    86 Global Posts
    #1438  
    Quote Originally Posted by DRS10 View Post
    Thanks for willing to do that. It may come in handy for other users of the superscript as well. Here is CallSynergizer.jsjsjs
    @DRS10 Could you try the attached patch ? It should be OK, the previous one was also modifying something that was already modified by the superperscript (a difference between PRE2 and VEER 2.2.4 in this file).
    Attached Files Attached Files
  19. #1439  
    Quote Originally Posted by TheOneill View Post
    @DRS10 Could you try the attached patch ? It should be OK, the previous one was also modifying something that was already modified by the superperscript (a difference between PRE2 and VEER 2.2.4 in this file).
    Yes, that worked! I'll report my findings. Thanks again.
  20. #1440  
    Quote Originally Posted by TheOneill View Post
    @DRS10 Could you try the attached patch ? It should be OK, the previous one was also modifying something that was already modified by the superperscript (a difference between PRE2 and VEER 2.2.4 in this file).
    this patch works for my version of veer 2.2.4 correctly

Posting Permissions