Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 46 of 46
Like Tree3Likes
  1.    #41  
    Does anyone know if the TCP congestion setting in Govnah would help with these network issues?

    -- Sent from my HP TouchPad using Communities
  2. #42  
    PC connected via wireless.

    C:\>ping google.com

    Pinging google.com [74.125.237.82] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 74.125.237.82: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=56
    Reply from 74.125.237.82: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=56
    Reply from 74.125.237.82: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=56
    Reply from 74.125.237.82: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=56

    Ping statistics for 74.125.237.82:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 50ms, Average = 49ms

    ====

    Touchpad (using novaterm) conected via same wireless access point.

    # ping -c 4 google.com
    PING google.com (74.125.237.84): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 74.125.237.84: seq=0 ttl=56 time=63.502 ms
    64 bytes from 74.125.237.84: seq=1 ttl=56 time=53.089 ms
    64 bytes from 74.125.237.84: seq=2 ttl=56 time=51.227 ms
    64 bytes from 74.125.237.84: seq=3 ttl=56 time=52.838 ms

    --- google.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 51.227/55.164/63.502 ms

    ====

    Speedtest.net using standard browser.
    Best Result: PING 61ms

    Some speedtest ping results using Touchpad are as high as 133ms.

    Repeated Speedtest.net checks with Firefox 4.0 on XP and so far, ping times using Firefox on XP are not as good as the standard browser on the Touchpad. Perhaps it might average out over a longer period... in any case, nothing to complain about here and right now I'm not using any speed-up mods at all.
  3. #43  
    Just noticed a slight difference in the above tests, but changing the number of data bytes in the packets, doesn't seem to have much impact (unless I use a huge packet size of course):

    # ping -s 32 -c 4 google.com
    PING google.com (74.125.237.80): 32 data bytes
    40 bytes from 74.125.237.80: seq=0 ttl=55 time=54.063 ms
    40 bytes from 74.125.237.80: seq=1 ttl=56 time=53.969 ms
    40 bytes from 74.125.237.80: seq=2 ttl=56 time=53.417 ms
    40 bytes from 74.125.237.80: seq=3 ttl=56 time=52.324 ms

    --- google.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max = 52.324/53.443/54.063 ms
  4. vicuong's Avatar
    Posts
    8 Posts
    Global Posts
    11 Global Posts
    #44  
    I've just ran a speedtest.net from my 32GB touchpad and get about 20ms for ping: http://www.speedtest.net/result/1504446430.png
  5. hotshot's Avatar
    Posts
    22 Posts
    Global Posts
    29 Global Posts
    #45  
    When I run speedtest to my ISP from my laptop, I get 20ms ping. Do the same from my touchpad and get 200ms. The download test is laptop 20Mbps, touchpad 2.17Mbps.

    Guys, what are the odds that everything, including pings, from the touchpad is being shanghai'ed to HP servers first so that their data miners can have first crack at all traffic?

    That would explain all the results here. Am I being too paranoid?
  6. kenmitch's Avatar
    Posts
    43 Posts
    Global Posts
    87 Global Posts
    #46  
    Signal strength makes or breaks your pings and speeds.

    Using speedtest.net closest server LA I get the following:

    Good signal closer to router....At referenced desktop

    Ping 15ms 3.31MB's down 1.47MB's up

    On the edge were sometimes get no connection error

    Ping 77ms 1.01MB's down 1.0MB's up

    3ft from router 1 wall between strong signal

    Ping 13ms 4.21MB's down 2.87MB's up

    Same server on hard wired desktop gets:

    Ping 5ms 5.1MB's down 3.7MB's up
    Last edited by kenmitch; 09/27/2011 at 10:22 AM.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions