webOS Nation Forums >  webOS Devices >  HP TouchPad > Crazy Range in Sunspider Score!
Crazy Range in Sunspider Score!
  Reply
Like Tree1Likes

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09/21/2011, 03:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
I've read a huge range of numbers for the Sunspider test on a TP (from 2800 to 4000). It seems the average score on an Android or Ipad2 is around 2200.

I'm at work and don't have my TP with me but I'll post my result tonight. Meanwhile, can you guys post your result so we can see what is the real score?

BTW, please let us know if your TP is OC'd and to what (1.5 or 1.7).

Thanks!
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 03:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
kkhanmd's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,069
32Gigs TP, 1.5Ghz overclock, TP native browser w patches: 3396.8 ms

My windows 7 machine core i7, 8Gig RAM, 1080p, chrome browser: 233.6ms
__________________
If this helped you hit thanks.
kkhanmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 65
What's sunspider
mettleh3d#WN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 28
Touchpad with Ueberkernel running at 1.2 GHz: 3878 ms

MacBook Pro, C2D 2.33 GHz, Mac OS X 10.6, 3 GB RAM, Firefox 7 beta: 304.2 ms
Hans Blafoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 336
TP 16gb, Uberkernel 1.5, all patches, 3100 ms stock browser, 3097 adv browswer
old Dell Inspiron 6400 laptop XP svc pack 3, 2gb ram, 532ms

BTW, despite the sunspider scores, my advanced browser has slowed down to the point that I am no longer using it and I use the stock. Has anyone else encountered this, and have a possible fix, maybe deleting an incompatible patch? It was working fine at first.
gergev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 6
You guys all realize that a lower score is better right?? You're all talking like 3000 is a good score.....
jhuynh2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhuynh2000 View Post
You guys all realize that a lower score is better right?? You're all talking like 3000 is a good score.....
I think most of us know lower score is better.
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked By: Hans Blafoo
Old 09/21/2011, 04:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 24
Touchpad 32gb Uberkernal 1.5, stock browser 3055.4ms

Phenom II x4, Windows 7, 4gb ram, IE9 255.9
rwcrossman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
Keep it coming guys!
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 120
Score is dependent upon which browser you use on different machines and wcores can vary wildly. Luckily, with the Touchpad we only have the two browsers, so the scores should compare well from TP to TP. However, comparisons to other tablets is subjective. Look at results below and you'll see what I mean.


32GB TP, 1.5Ghz uberkernal, TP advanced browser with all patches: 4369.3 ms

64GB iPad2 jailbroken using Atomic Web Browser: 5542.1ms
64GB ipad2 jailbroken using native Safari Web Browser: 2073.1ms

2010 iMac 27" i3 using latest version of Safari: 214.3ms

2010 MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo using Safari: 309.4ms
2010 MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo using Firefox 6.0.2: 306.5ms

Now with regards to the ipad2 using Atomic Web Browser, I can tell you that opening web pages is faster than either the Touchpad or using native Safari browser, yet the score reflects it as being the slowest.
__________________
sent from my 32gb Touchpad
Mac.World is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked By: clayclay350
Old 09/21/2011, 04:47 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac.World View Post
Score is dependent upon which browser you use on different machines and wcores can vary wildly. Luckily, with the Touchpad we only have the two browsers, so the scores should compare well from TP to TP. However, comparisons to other tablets is subjective. Look at results below and you'll see what I mean.


32GB TP, 1.5Ghz uberkernal, TP advanced browser with all patches: 4369.3 ms

64GB iPad2 jailbroken using Atomic Web Browser: 5542.1ms
64GB ipad2 jailbroken using native Safari Web Browser: 2073.1ms

2010 iMac 27" i3 using latest version of Safari: 214.3ms

2010 MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo using Safari: 309.4ms
2010 MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo using Firefox 6.0.2: 306.5ms

Now with regards to the ipad2 using Atomic Web Browser, I can tell you that opening web pages is faster than either the Touchpad or using native Safari browser, yet the score reflects it as being the slowest.
So these results prove the score doesn't necessarily corelate to browser speed?
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 34
Touchpad 32gb, UK @ 1.5GHz, stock browser 3100.8ms
Palm Pre 2, stock - 5993.8ms
Laptop using IE9 Win 7 64bit, Core i7 Quad @1.73, 8GB Ram - 316.6ms
(sunspider 0.9.1)
PostmanPat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 04:55 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
Quadcore (Xenon E5506 @ 2.13ghz with 3.5g ram), Windows XP, IE 7:

24841.0ms

Very strange. Score must be browser dependent so different scores on different machines using different browsers are pretty meaningless.
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 05:07 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 128
Touchpad Uberkernel Stock speed: 3819.1ms
Touchpad Uberkernel 1.512ghz: 3150.7ms
muyoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 05:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
miljbee's Avatar
 
Posts: 16
iPhone 4 iOS 4.3.3/Safari : 4776
miljbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 05:19 PM   #16 (permalink)
Member
 
DaveInFL's Avatar
 
Posts: 923
TP, Uberkernel 1.5Ghz: 3792.0ms
Laptop, Win 7, 64bit : 284.8ms
Samsung Epic Touch: 3239.7ms
__________________
Golf Caddie Homepage | Follow us on FACEBOOK
DaveInFL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 05:20 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 83
I made this thread earlier for sunspider on the pre3

http://forums.precentral.net/hp-pre-...sunspider.html

And Sunspider doesn't show how fast is your browser, only javascript execution in your browser. It's a nice test, but it's more about the power of the device than the browser actually.
Bokal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 05:27 PM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 2,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac.World View Post
Score is dependent upon which browser you use on different machines and wcores can vary wildly. Luckily, with the Touchpad we only have the two browsers, so the scores should compare well from TP to TP. However, comparisons to other tablets is subjective. Look at results below and you'll see what I mean.


32GB TP, 1.5Ghz uberkernal, TP advanced browser with all patches: 4369.3 ms

64GB iPad2 jailbroken using Atomic Web Browser: 5542.1ms
64GB ipad2 jailbroken using native Safari Web Browser: 2073.1ms


2010 iMac 27" i3 using latest version of Safari: 214.3ms

2010 MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo using Safari: 309.4ms
2010 MacBook Pro 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo using Firefox 6.0.2: 306.5ms

Now with regards to the ipad2 using Atomic Web Browser, I can tell you that opening web pages is faster than either the Touchpad or using native Safari browser, yet the score reflects it as being the slowest.
Yeah, I don't think third party browsers utilize the Nitro engine in iOS 4.3.
nappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 05:56 PM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
ncinerate's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,084
My pc (Windows 7, quad core AMD phenom 2 clocked @ 3.4ghz, 4 gigs of 1200 speed DDR2) = 244.2ms

My touchpad @ 1.7ghz ondemand) = 2906.8ms
My touchpad @ dual 1.8ghz fulltime = 2705.3ms
My touchpad @ dual 1.8ghz fulltime using "private browser HD" = screen bounces around like crazy running the benchmark and it only scores 3125.7ms
My touchpad @ dual 1.8ghz fulltime using "Advanced Browser" = 2787.7ms
My touchpad @ 1.8ghz ondemand = oddly enough, 2940.2ms

So there you have it. Seems the difference between 1.7 and 1.8ghz is pretty negligible when you have the ondemand settings on. Multiple tests yield a small range, sometimes coming in faster or slower, but always pretty comparable. Dual fulltime 1.8ghz obviously is faster, but the battery will take a hit performing like that .
__________________
New to webOS? Here's my definitive Get Started guide: http://forums.webosnation.com/hp-tou...ted-guide.html

Want to dual boot Android on your Touchpad? Here's my guide: http://forums.webosnation.com/androi...ted-guide.html

If you find anything I do here is useful, please feel free to
!!!

Long Live webOS and our Palm gear!

Last edited by ncinerate; 09/21/2011 at 06:03 PM.
ncinerate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09/21/2011, 06:13 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 10
16GB Touchpad OC'd using F15 to 1.8Ghz, using Preware patches, stock browser - sunspider score of 2902.4ms
dizzneeguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes



 


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0