webOS Nation Forums >  webOS Devices >  HP TouchPad > Crazy Range in Sunspider Score!
Crazy Range in Sunspider Score!
  Reply
Like Tree1Likes

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10/21/2011, 02:48 PM   #41 (permalink)
Member
 
chicle11's Avatar
 
Posts: 181
32gb, 3.04, F4 @ 1.7 ondemandtcl = 2598
chicle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/21/2011, 02:56 PM   #42 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 43
Never tried this before!

Desktop: 111.9ms < Pretty much a beast >

TouchPad(32gb): 2851.4ms < 3.0.4 uberkernal 1.512ghz >

TouchPad(32gb): 2572.2ms <CM7 Default browser 1.512ghz >

TouchPad(32gb): 2395.6ms <CM7 Default browser 1.782ghz >

Last edited by kenmitch; 10/21/2011 at 03:04 PM.
kenmitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/21/2011, 03:40 PM   #43 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 539
TouchPad 32GB - 2095.9ms - CM7 Alpha2.1 @ 1.782ghz - Dolphin HD
TouchPad 32GB - 2219.6 - CM7 Alpha2.1 @ 1.782ghz - Default Browser
TouchPad 32GB - 2859.3 - CM7 Alpha2.1 @ 1.782ghz - SkyFire Browser
__________________
8MB Visor --> Treo 300 --> Treo 650 --> Treo 800w --> Palm Pre
All devices obtained within first week of launch

Last edited by Kaerey; 10/21/2011 at 03:48 PM.
Kaerey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/21/2011, 10:56 PM   #44 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by next_milenium View Post
32g OC'd to 1.5 uberkernel with patches.

3358 (3357 on 2nd run so very consistent).

it seems comparing different machines on different browser can only give you a rough comparison of browser (javascript actually) performance.

what I really like to know is why mine is slower than others with same configuration.
Vast improvement with 3.04 and UK 1.5 ondemand.

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 2719.1ms +/- 1.2%

19% increase and I can really feel it.
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked by jdcowboy likes this.
Old 10/21/2011, 11:03 PM   #45 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 52
32gb OC'd to 1.5 uberkernel w/ patches

3285.9ms
uprisingchuns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/21/2011, 11:19 PM   #46 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 333
Quote:
Originally Posted by uprisingchuns View Post
32gb OC'd to 1.5 uberkernel w/ patches

3285.9ms
are you on 3.04? Seems a little high.
next_milenium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/2011, 07:34 AM   #47 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 20
16g TP, 3.04, OC'ed to Uberkernel 1.5g, 2650.5ms +/- 1.0%, pretty good, definitely a lot better than 3.02 Oc'ed to Uber 1.5g, which seemed to be well above 3000ms according to previous posts.
jdcowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/2011, 02:00 PM   #48 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 49
64Gb at 1,5Ghz, 3.0.4, stock kernel, stock browser and I got 2671, 2950 with Advance browser
hakkinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/2011, 02:25 PM   #49 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by next_milenium View Post
are you on 3.04? Seems a little high.
yea, was my mistake. Had updated govnah and forgot to set the profile. Score is 2765ms with the OC to 1.5 uberkernal
uprisingchuns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10/22/2011, 02:49 PM   #50 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 11
32Gb 3.04 UK 1.5Ghz 2797.3ms +/- 1.2% :thumbnail:
deewalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11/16/2012, 08:53 AM   #51 (permalink)
Member
 
Posts: 1
I got a score of 162.2ms on sunspider.
Specs:
gtx 560 ti phantom 2
i3 3.3 ghz
8 gig ram 1333mzh
google chrome
Lazarus_092 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

 

Thread Tools
Display Modes



 


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0