Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26
Like Tree4Likes
  1. #21  
    Hi all,

    Here is a glimpse of webOS future...if 1/2 of this article is correct, then we can expect webOS to have a long and happy life after the death of the TouchPad, Pre2, Pre3 & Veer. Please read well beyond the title...the title of this article about webOS on a Ipad is the least of positive info for loves of webOS!

    Take care,

    Jay

    Friday August 19, 2011, Matt Brian

    HP tested webOS on an iPad. It ran over twice as fast as the TouchPad.

    HP tested webOS on an iPad. It ran over twice as fast. - TNW Apple

    HP’s WebOS team almost certainly had an idea that the company’s new tablet, the TouchPad, had very little chance of challenging Apple’s dominance in the tablet market, as the company’s webOS operating system was running “over twice as fast” on its rival’s iPad 2 tablet, a source close to the subject revealed to The Next Web. Update below.

    With HP announcing it is to cease development of its webOS devices, we learned that before the HP’s TouchPad tablet and Pre smartphones were even released, everyone within the webOS team “wanted them gone”.

    The hardware reportedly stopped the team from innovating beyond certain points because it was slow and imposed constraints, which was highlighted when webOS was loaded on to Apple’s iPad device and found to run the platform significantly faster than the device for which it was originally developed.

    With a focus on web technologies, webOS could be deployed in the iPad’s Mobile Safari browser as a web-app; this produced similar results, with it running many times faster in the browser than it did on the TouchPad.

    When HP announced its acquisition of Palm, the computing giant had already built the TouchPad hardware that sits on the shelves today. Basically, the TouchPad was a two-year old piece of hardware that the webOS team equipped with their tablet-friendly platform.

    Our source also indicated that HP also had plans to release a 7-inch version of the TouchPad, the TouchPad Go. This was already in production and before yesterday was expected to launch in the coming months. It is unknown whether it will ever see a public launch now. The TouchPad Go was seen as a better looking and nicer feeling device that had the potential to sell, with it believed that sales of the device would outpace the TouchPad’s if it had been released before its larger cousin.

    We’ve also heard that HP in fact already had the next generation of TouchPad in the works. The details are very fuzzy here but we believe that it would be a lighter model with a higher-resolution ‘retina’ display and a metal body. Nothing out of the ordinary if HP truly wanted to make a splash with its next potential offering.

    Because webOS is limited to working on the Qualcomm chipset, potential hardware partners would need to have a special version of webOS written for their hardware. This makes it hard to determine a likely licensee, but we know that HP has already been working on porting webOS to other architectures, including Apple’s A5 SoC.

    With development stopping on future HP webOS devices, the webOS team face an uncertain future. HP has said it will license the platform, prompting suggestions that smartphone vendors including HTC and Samsung could look to the operating system given the recent developments between Google and Motorola.

    If you are interested in reading how HP came to the decision to kill off its webOS devices and how different teams came to learn of the news, we suggest you look at our inside look at what happened.

    Update: As reader Joshua Tewell points out in the comments below, webOS has and continues to run on other chipsets besides Qualcomm’s. This supports the fact that webOS may have been adapted to other chipsets, but it makes the statement in the article above that webOS is ‘limited to working on the Qualcomm chipset’ inaccurate. Thank you for the information Joshua.

    Just to clarify one more thing as well, we have heard that Enyo apps were tested on the iPad, although we were also specifically told that webOS was tested natively in some fashion on the iPad. It’s unclear which of these tests the speed estimate was based on.
    Please Support Research into Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain and Spinal Injuries. If You Suffer from These, Consider Joining or Better Yet Forming a Support Group. No One Should Suffer from the Burden of Chronic Pain, Jay M. S. Founder, Leesburg Fibromyalgia/Resources Group
  2. #22  
    merged
  3. #23  
    Quote Originally Posted by hakost View Post
    What would it take to port WebOS to run on an IPad or Galaxy Tab? (if the code was made available)?
    Is the code in layers so one could only rebuild the underlaying code?
    That would be illegal, because the webOS operating system source code is certainly not open source.
  4. akshunj's Avatar
    Posts
    379 Posts
    Global Posts
    380 Global Posts
    #24  
    I thought the original article being cited claimed that webOS was 2x as fast as iOS on an iPad????
  5. #25  
    nyuepik likes this.
  6. Bo
    Bo is offline
    Bo's Avatar
    Posts
    113 Posts
    Global Posts
    196 Global Posts
    #26  
    this article is not totally correct. They ran the Enyo SDK within the browser of an iPad and that was faster because its compiled more efficiently than the browser on the touchpad. I really don't like this type of reporting. When I find the actual article I'll try to post it.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions