Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21  
    Quote Originally Posted by sapient2k7 View Post
    ATT and Verizon did not put advertising dollars behind Palm last time as they already had their flagship devices (iphone and Droid). They were also not going to put money over a device with 1.0 OS. This is normal as MS is going to have to do the heavy lifting for Windows Phone 7 (Unless att loses exclusivity and decides to start pushing Win Phone 7 which I don't believe is likely to happen, they might go Android instead).
    Well actually verizon did do an advertising push with the pre+ and pixi+, they were airing on hulu for a while and I did see a few banner adds online as well (don't actually watch tv so don't know if they had tv adds as well). Now as to the quality of the adds that's a different story all together. They were mostly aimed at moms and the female tween-young adult market and none of them really showed any compelling reasons to purchase the phone.
    check my webos facebook group http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=129304747081175

    help me reach my goal to be the first non celebrity on twitter with 1 million followers http://www.twitter.com/darkproteus66

    LONG LIVE HOMEBREW!!!
  2. #22  
    If palm wanted to do advertising right they would do their own adds and split them into two categories, first they should do more adds like the original pixi commercial http://bit.ly/9VsKyF targeted at the young adult market and second being the life moves fast campaign http://bit.ly/bIepfD targeted at the buisness users and older 25+ market.
    check my webos facebook group http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=129304747081175

    help me reach my goal to be the first non celebrity on twitter with 1 million followers http://www.twitter.com/darkproteus66

    LONG LIVE HOMEBREW!!!
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions