Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2789101112
Results 221 to 229 of 229
  1. #221  
    Looks like another company might be jumping into the Palm talks. If you don't know who Huawei is, they are a huge phone manufacturer in China (one of the biggest) and may be looking to expand their name. They are the long-shot, but who knows.

    This could all turn out to be a move for Palm to get another cash infusion from the bank and investors and not really a plan to sell. Gonna be fun to watch anyhow!
  2. #222  
    http://forums.precentral.net/web-os-...tapps-com.html

    Yes, I am with Palm. I'm in the DTS group. I can't comment on the rumors other than to say this. I went through the buyout of Sun by Oracle. The rumors are almost never true. There were *tons* of Sun buyout rumors for years before the Oracle deal happened. I wouldn't worry about it. One way or another we'll keep making great webOS devices for you to put your great apps on.
    __________________
    Developer Advocate, Palm Inc.
    A copy and paste from another thread, small hopes that it may not happen soon, Again very small hopes
  3. #223  
    BLOOMBERG:Misek Says a Possible Sale `Makes Sense' for Palm: Video

    IMO this guy analys Palm situation right to the point
    YouTube - Bloomberg's Channel
  4. #224  
    well it won't be too late for the htc evo to have WebOs on it if htc gets palm.....its plenty of time for that to come about..webos was up for a 4g device on sprint anyway right
  5. #225  
    that lady looks like she is on drugs lol
  6. #226  
    Pam burns $80 miilion every 3 months.

    Palm Buyer Would Gain WebOS Operating System, Patents: Video

  7. #227  
    Ars Technica is posing the same question about the true value of Palm's patents here:

    Palm may be for sale, but are its patents really valuable?
  8. #228  
    Quote Originally Posted by nappy View Post
    Ars Technica is posing the same question about the true value of Palm's patents here:

    Palm may be for sale, but are its patents really valuable?
    The problem is, he doesn't actually say anything in the article. I mean, he's speculating "why hasn't Palm sued anyone if they have such important patents," but he doesn't do any research into their patents himself, doesn't talk to a patent lawyer to get an opinion that might actually mean anything, he just states a question as if it means something, when I'm sure there's a ton of other reasons why they didn't sue. It just is bad logic. One doesn't imply the other.

    ...Though I'm not a lawyer either.
  9. #229  
    I haven't read the whole thread because...well because it's 12 pages long So forgive me if this has been discussed, but has anyone considered this might be a ploy to simply show off how valuable Palm actually is? By courting "buyers" they can show just what there patent portfolio is worth and perhaps entice someone to get a much needed cash infusion. Just a thought of course.
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2789101112

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions