View Single Post
Old 12/01/2009, 12:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
mu7efcer
Member
 
mu7efcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 921
Likes Received: 7
Thanks: 169
Thanked 229 Times in 141 Posts
Default

If anyone can demonstrate that the Pixi is actually slower than the Pre, please show me how. I've tried. I can't find it. IMHO there are only two things that differentiate the Pixi and the Pre: screensize and wifi. Processor speed isn't one of them.

I'd really like reviewers do either of the following:
  1. stop using "slower processor" as a knock on the Pixi, or
  2. demonstrate the criteria under which the Pixi actually performs worse than the Pre
__________________
Twitter: dullgeek
mu7efcer is offline   Reply With Quote