Quote:
Originally Posted by Woof
Excuse me but the good Drs. are trying to further their agenda. The made a statement and sold it as fact. The burden of proof is on them to substantiate their claim, not me to disprove it.
|
What the good doctors' analysis demonstrates is that their conclusions can be reproduced with no less than 95% reliabilty by another researcher. No one, including you, has shown how their analytical methods are flawed to support your ultimate claim that their confidence intervals of 95% are in error. Please show them the error of their ways!